Do rewards support or thwart autonomy in prison? A survey study into the relationships between rewards, autonomy and self-governance ability

Western prison managements increasingly combine disciplinary and responsabilising techniques to promote behaviour change in incarcerated individuals. Reward systems in prison (RSPs) are clear examples of this. In RSPs, external rewards are provided contingent on compliance with behavioural demands. This paper explores whether (a) rewards are associated with privilege level; (b) rewards are experienced as autonomy-supportive or autonomy-frustrating and (c) to what extent these relationships depend on self-governance ability. These questions are answered using self-report survey data from the Life in Custody study ( N = 1011), collected in nine Dutch prisons. Results indicate that rewards are inconsistently allocated. However, individuals who reported more external rewards also reported significantly more perceived autonomy. Finally, greater self-governance ability was significantly associated with less autonomy frustration when individuals reported more rewards. Multiple recommendations for policy and practice are articulated. Future research should explore (structural and personal) conditions under which external rewards can support autonomy-supportive prisons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminology & Criminal Justice
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958261469376
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do rewards support or thwart autonomy in prison? A survey study into the relationships between rewards, autonomy and self-governance ability

Esther van Ginneken, Paul Nieuwbeerta, Jan Maarten Elbers, Miranda Boone et al.
Criminology & Criminal Justice
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Do rewards support or thwart autonomy in prison? A survey study into the relationships between rewards, autonomy and self-governance ability

Esther van Ginneken, Paul Nieuwbeerta, Jan Maarten Elbers, Miranda Boone, Hanneke Palmen
article en

Abstract

Western prison managements increasingly combine disciplinary and responsabilising techniques to promote behaviour change in incarcerated individuals. Reward systems in prison (RSPs) are clear examples of this. In RSPs, external rewards are provided contingent on compliance with behavioural demands. This paper explores whether (a) rewards are associated with privilege level; (b) rewards are experienced as autonomy-supportive or autonomy-frustrating and (c) to what extent these relationships depend on self-governance ability. These questions are answered using self-report survey data from the Life in Custody study ( N = 1011), collected in nine Dutch prisons. Results indicate that rewards are inconsistently allocated. However, individuals who reported more external rewards also reported significantly more perceived autonomy. Finally, greater self-governance ability was significantly associated with less autonomy frustration when individuals reported more rewards. Multiple recommendations for policy and practice are articulated. Future research should explore (structural and personal) conditions under which external rewards can support autonomy-supportive prisons.

Criminology & Criminal Justice
Leiden University (NL), Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.