Immunogenicity, Tolerability, and Safety of BA.1-Adapted BNT162b2 Vaccine in 18- to 55-Year-Olds Previously Vaccinated with BNT162b2 or Who Were COVID-19 Vaccine-Naive

INTRODUCTION: Variant-adapted COVID-19 vaccines can induce more robust immune responses against closely matched circulating variants than original vaccines. METHODS: Within a phase 3 master study, monovalent Omicron BA.1-adapted BNT162b2 (BNT162b2-BA.1) was evaluated in healthy BNT162b2-experienced (cohorts 1-2) or COVID-19 vaccine-naive (cohort 3) 18 to 55 year-olds. Primary immunogenicity endpoints in cohort 1 were geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Omicron BA.1 neutralizing titers 1 month after BNT162b2-BA.1 to those after one BNT162b2 dose and differences in percentages of participants with Omicron BA.1 seroresponse between BNT162b2-BA.1 and BNT162b2. In cohort 2, primary immunogenicity objectives (participants without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection) were to demonstrate superiority (GMR two-sided 95% CI lower limit > 1) with respect to neutralizing titer levels and noninferiority with respect to seroresponse difference (difference two-sided 95% CI lower limit > - 5%) for BNT162b2-BA.1 versus BNT162b2. In cohort 3, primary immunogenicity objectives were to demonstrate superiority with respect to neutralizing titer levels and noninferiority with respect to seroresponse after two BNT162b2-BA.1 doses compared with participants receiving BNT162b2 in an efficacy trial. Reactogenicity and adverse event frequencies were determined. RESULTS: A total of 1471 participants were included. In cohort 1 (BNT162b2-experienced), GMRs compared with one BNT162b2 dose were 2.87 and 2.64 after one or two BNT162b2-BA.1 doses, respectively, and differences in percentages of participants with seroresponse between BNT162b2-BA.1 and BNT162b2 were 29.0% and 21.0% for one or two BNT162b2-BA.1 doses. In cohort 2 (BNT162b2-experienced), one BNT162b2-BA.1 dose met prespecified superiority and noninferiority criteria with respect to GMR and difference in percentage of participants achieving seroresponse, respectively, compared with BNT162b2. In cohort 3 (COVID-19 vaccine-naive), superiority with respect to GMR and noninferiority with respect to difference in percentage of participants achieving seroresponse of BNT162b2-BA.1 to BNT162b2 were met. BNT162b2-BA.1 and BNT162b2 safety and tolerability profiles were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Omicron BA.1-adapted COVID-19 vaccines can broaden immune responses against Omicron BA.1 SARS-CoV-2 variants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04955626.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-026-01409-1
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immunogenicity, Tolerability, and Safety of BA.1-Adapted BNT162b2 Vaccine in 18- to 55-Year-Olds Previously Vaccinated with BNT162b2 or Who Were COVID-19 Vaccine-Naive

Mookho Malahleha, Annaliesa S. Anderson, Kayvon Modjarrad, Juleen Gayed et al.
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

Immunogenicity, Tolerability, and Safety of BA.1-Adapted BNT162b2 Vaccine in 18- to 55-Year-Olds Previously Vaccinated with BNT162b2 or Who Were COVID-19 Vaccine-Naive

Mookho Malahleha, Annaliesa S. Anderson, Kayvon Modjarrad, Juleen Gayed, Xia Xu, Kena A. Swanson, Leon F. Fouche, Georgina Keep, Federico Mensa, Uğur Şahin, Omair Sahgal, Ying Zhang, David Cooper, David Fitz-Patrick, Essack Mitha, Nicholas Kitchin, Alejandra Gurtman, Todd Belanger, Ӧzlem Türeci
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Variant-adapted COVID-19 vaccines can induce more robust immune responses against closely matched circulating variants than original vaccines. METHODS: Within a phase 3 master study, monovalent Omicron BA.1-adapted BNT162b2 (BNT162b2-BA.1) was evaluated in healthy BNT162b2-experienced (cohorts 1-2) or COVID-19 vaccine-naive (cohort 3) 18 to 55 year-olds. Primary immunogenicity endpoints in cohort 1 were geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Omicron BA.1 neutralizing titers 1 month after BNT162b2-BA.1 to those after one BNT162b2 dose and differences in percentages of participants with Omicron BA.1 seroresponse between BNT162b2-BA.1 and BNT162b2. In cohort 2, primary immunogenicity objectives (participants without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection) were to demonstrate superiority (GMR two-sided 95% CI lower limit > 1) with respect to neutralizing titer levels and noninferiority with respect to seroresponse difference (difference two-sided 95% CI lower limit > - 5%) for BNT162b2-BA.1 versus BNT162b2. In cohort 3, primary immunogenicity objectives were to demonstrate superiority with respect to neutralizing titer levels and noninferiority with respect to seroresponse after two BNT162b2-BA.1 doses compared with participants receiving BNT162b2 in an efficacy trial. Reactogenicity and adverse event frequencies were determined. RESULTS: A total of 1471 participants were included. In cohort 1 (BNT162b2-experienced), GMRs compared with one BNT162b2 dose were 2.87 and 2.64 after one or two BNT162b2-BA.1 doses, respectively, and differences in percentages of participants with seroresponse between BNT162b2-BA.1 and BNT162b2 were 29.0% and 21.0% for one or two BNT162b2-BA.1 doses. In cohort 2 (BNT162b2-experienced), one BNT162b2-BA.1 dose met prespecified superiority and noninferiority criteria with respect to GMR and difference in percentage of participants achieving seroresponse, respectively, compared with BNT162b2. In cohort 3 (COVID-19 vaccine-naive), superiority with respect to GMR and noninferiority with respect to difference in percentage of participants achieving seroresponse of BNT162b2-BA.1 to BNT162b2 were met. BNT162b2-BA.1 and BNT162b2 safety and tolerability profiles were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Omicron BA.1-adapted COVID-19 vaccines can broaden immune responses against Omicron BA.1 SARS-CoV-2 variants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04955626.

Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Pfizer (United States) (US), Pfizer (United Kingdom) (GB), East–West Center (US), BioNTech (Germany) (DE), Synergy Health (US)
Pfizer
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.