Immunogenicity, Tolerability, and Safety of BA.1-Adapted BNT162b2 Vaccine in 18- to 55-Year-Olds Previously Vaccinated with BNT162b2 or Who Were COVID-19 Vaccine-Naive
INTRODUCTION: Variant-adapted COVID-19 vaccines can induce more robust immune responses against closely matched circulating variants than original vaccines. METHODS: Within a phase 3 master study, monovalent Omicron BA.1-adapted BNT162b2 (BNT162b2-BA.1) was evaluated in healthy BNT162b2-experienced (cohorts 1-2) or COVID-19 vaccine-naive (cohort 3) 18 to 55 year-olds. Primary immunogenicity endpoints in cohort 1 were geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Omicron BA.1 neutralizing titers 1 month after BNT162b2-BA.1 to those after one BNT162b2 dose and differences in percentages of participants with Omicron BA.1 seroresponse between BNT162b2-BA.1 and BNT162b2. In cohort 2, primary immunogenicity objectives (participants without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection) were to demonstrate superiority (GMR two-sided 95% CI lower limit > 1) with respect to neutralizing titer levels and noninferiority with respect to seroresponse difference (difference two-sided 95% CI lower limit > - 5%) for BNT162b2-BA.1 versus BNT162b2. In cohort 3, primary immunogenicity objectives were to demonstrate superiority with respect to neutralizing titer levels and noninferiority with respect to seroresponse after two BNT162b2-BA.1 doses compared with participants receiving BNT162b2 in an efficacy trial. Reactogenicity and adverse event frequencies were determined. RESULTS: A total of 1471 participants were included. In cohort 1 (BNT162b2-experienced), GMRs compared with one BNT162b2 dose were 2.87 and 2.64 after one or two BNT162b2-BA.1 doses, respectively, and differences in percentages of participants with seroresponse between BNT162b2-BA.1 and BNT162b2 were 29.0% and 21.0% for one or two BNT162b2-BA.1 doses. In cohort 2 (BNT162b2-experienced), one BNT162b2-BA.1 dose met prespecified superiority and noninferiority criteria with respect to GMR and difference in percentage of participants achieving seroresponse, respectively, compared with BNT162b2. In cohort 3 (COVID-19 vaccine-naive), superiority with respect to GMR and noninferiority with respect to difference in percentage of participants achieving seroresponse of BNT162b2-BA.1 to BNT162b2 were met. BNT162b2-BA.1 and BNT162b2 safety and tolerability profiles were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Omicron BA.1-adapted COVID-19 vaccines can broaden immune responses against Omicron BA.1 SARS-CoV-2 variants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04955626.
Authors
- Mookho Malahleha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1879-8471)
- Annaliesa S. Anderson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6413-1718)
- Kayvon Modjarrad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6514-5572)
- Juleen Gayed (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2974-5302)
- Xia Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3799-0872)
- Kena A. Swanson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3389-8414)
- Leon F. Fouche (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6297-9328)
- Georgina Keep
- Federico Mensa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9421-1268)
- Uğur Şahin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0363-1564)
- Omair Sahgal
- Ying Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6214-2440)
- David Cooper
- David Fitz-Patrick
- Essack Mitha
- Nicholas Kitchin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1808-3380)
- Alejandra Gurtman
- Todd Belanger
- Ӧzlem Türeci
Institutions
- Pfizer (United States) (US)
- Pfizer (United Kingdom) (GB)
- East–West Center (US)
- BioNTech (Germany) (DE)
- Synergy Health (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Infectious Diseases and Therapy
- Published
- 2026-07-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-026-01409-1
- Primary Topic
- SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Pfizer