Colon interposition after esophagectomy: a 15-year single-center experience

Abstract Background Colonic interposition is the preferred option for alimentary tract reconstruction when a gastric conduit pull-up is not feasible. Aim of this study was to evaluate perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing colonic interposition for various indications in our tertiary-care center over a 15-year period. Methods Following institutional board approval, all consecutive patients who underwent colonic interposition for esophageal replacement were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Comprehensive chart review and descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Results Ninety-three patients (62 men, 31 women, median age 65 years, IQR 55.5–72) underwent colonic interposition between January 2009 and December 2023. Benign disease was present in 17.2%, whereas malignancy accounted for 82.8%. A hand-sewn cervical anastomosis was performed in 96.8% of patients. The colonic graft, predominantly based on the left colic artery (89.2%) was routed through the posterior mediastinum in 51.6% and via the retrosternal route in 47.3%. Median operative time was 303 min (IQR 247.5–364). Major complications included anastomotic leakage (28%), anastomotic stenosis (30.1%), pleural empyema (11.8%), and postoperative bleeding (10.8%). The reoperation rate was 38.7%, with a median hospital stay of 29 days (IQR 20–63). In-hospital mortality was 18.3%. Conclusion Colonic interposition after esophagectomy is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly in the salvage and secondary reconstruction setting, and should be confined to experienced, high-volume centers. Clinical registration number FMS_D_007.23-I-1

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04140-0
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Colon interposition after esophagectomy: a 15-year single-center experience

Luca Giulini, Melissa Kemeter, Attila Dubecz, Patrick Heger et al.
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Colon interposition after esophagectomy: a 15-year single-center experience

Luca Giulini, Melissa Kemeter, Attila Dubecz, Patrick Heger, Markus K. Diener, Lucas Thumfart, Felix J. Hüttner
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Colonic interposition is the preferred option for alimentary tract reconstruction when a gastric conduit pull-up is not feasible. Aim of this study was to evaluate perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing colonic interposition for various indications in our tertiary-care center over a 15-year period. Methods Following institutional board approval, all consecutive patients who underwent colonic interposition for esophageal replacement were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Comprehensive chart review and descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Results Ninety-three patients (62 men, 31 women, median age 65 years, IQR 55.5–72) underwent colonic interposition between January 2009 and December 2023. Benign disease was present in 17.2%, whereas malignancy accounted for 82.8%. A hand-sewn cervical anastomosis was performed in 96.8% of patients. The colonic graft, predominantly based on the left colic artery (89.2%) was routed through the posterior mediastinum in 51.6% and via the retrosternal route in 47.3%. Median operative time was 303 min (IQR 247.5–364). Major complications included anastomotic leakage (28%), anastomotic stenosis (30.1%), pleural empyema (11.8%), and postoperative bleeding (10.8%). The reoperation rate was 38.7%, with a median hospital stay of 29 days (IQR 20–63). In-hospital mortality was 18.3%. Conclusion Colonic interposition after esophagectomy is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly in the salvage and secondary reconstruction setting, and should be confined to experienced, high-volume centers. Clinical registration number FMS_D_007.23-I-1

Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.