Development and Content Validity of the Movement Compensatory Screening (MoCS): A Structured Framework for Identifying Compensatory Strategies After Stroke

BACKGROUND: Compensatory movement strategies are common after stroke and vary across individuals and tasks. However, the lack of a structured framework to guide movement analysis during mobility and postural control tasks may limit consistent identification of these strategies across clinicians in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To develop and examine the content validity of the Movement Compensatory Screening (MoCS) to identify compensatory movement strategies during mobility and postural control tasks after stroke. METHODS: Following the Delphi method and COSMIN guidelines, the MoCS was developed through a multi-phase process. Item generation was based on a literature review, exploratory video analysis of individuals after stroke, and expert input. Item-level content validity was evaluated in 2 Delphi rounds using relevance and clarity ratings (Content Validity Coefficient ≥ 0.80). Instrument-level content comprehensiveness was subsequently assessed through a Delphi-based global evaluation by physiotherapists. RESULTS: The final MoCS comprised 65 items across 7 domains: sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit transfer, gait, turn, climb up/down stairs, and dynamic standing balance. Initial mean CVC values were 0.89 for relevance and 0.86 for clarity, leading to item exclusion or refinement. Revised items achieved mean CVC values of 0.93 and 0.88 and were retained. An instrument-level evaluation indicated adequate content comprehensiveness, with expert agreement that the final item set sufficiently covered compensatory movement domains. A compensatory index (CI) was used to describe compensatory strategies by domain and anatomical plane. CONCLUSION: The MoCS demonstrated content validity as an observational framework for identifying compensatory movement strategies during mobility and postural control tasks after stroke.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683261464075
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Content Validity of the Movement Compensatory Screening (MoCS): A Structured Framework for Identifying Compensatory Strategies After Stroke

Gustavo José Luvizutto, Pedro Henrique Sousa de Andrade, Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza, Rodrigo Bazan
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Development and Content Validity of the Movement Compensatory Screening (MoCS): A Structured Framework for Identifying Compensatory Strategies After Stroke

Gustavo José Luvizutto, Pedro Henrique Sousa de Andrade, Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza, Rodrigo Bazan
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Compensatory movement strategies are common after stroke and vary across individuals and tasks. However, the lack of a structured framework to guide movement analysis during mobility and postural control tasks may limit consistent identification of these strategies across clinicians in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To develop and examine the content validity of the Movement Compensatory Screening (MoCS) to identify compensatory movement strategies during mobility and postural control tasks after stroke. METHODS: Following the Delphi method and COSMIN guidelines, the MoCS was developed through a multi-phase process. Item generation was based on a literature review, exploratory video analysis of individuals after stroke, and expert input. Item-level content validity was evaluated in 2 Delphi rounds using relevance and clarity ratings (Content Validity Coefficient ≥ 0.80). Instrument-level content comprehensiveness was subsequently assessed through a Delphi-based global evaluation by physiotherapists. RESULTS: The final MoCS comprised 65 items across 7 domains: sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit transfer, gait, turn, climb up/down stairs, and dynamic standing balance. Initial mean CVC values were 0.89 for relevance and 0.86 for clarity, leading to item exclusion or refinement. Revised items achieved mean CVC values of 0.93 and 0.88 and were retained. An instrument-level evaluation indicated adequate content comprehensiveness, with expert agreement that the final item set sufficiently covered compensatory movement domains. A compensatory index (CI) was used to describe compensatory strategies by domain and anatomical plane. CONCLUSION: The MoCS demonstrated content validity as an observational framework for identifying compensatory movement strategies during mobility and postural control tasks after stroke.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro (BR), Medecell (Brazil) (BR), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.