QoQ-Med3: a multimodal reasoning foundation model for clinical analysis

Multimodal reasoning-based foundation models (MRFMs) hold considerable promise for addressing key challenges in medical practice, yet their readiness for real-world deployment remains insufficiently explored. To bridge this gap, we developed two MRFMs (QoQ-Med3 and QoQ-Med3-MIMIC) and systematically evaluated their (i) generalizability to previously unseen clinical modalities and tasks, (ii) transferability to held-out datasets collected across different clinical sites, and (iii) robustness to real-world challenges like cross-site heterogeneity. Our results demonstrate that these models can learn transferable representations across modalities, tasks, and heterogeneous clinical datasets. QoQ-Med3 achieves an overall balanced accuracy of 71.3% and a F1 of 0.349, superceding all open-source and closed-source models, including GPT-4o, with particularly pronounced gains in understudied modalities such as ultrasound and mammography. The model trained on public clinical data only generalized to both the held-out MIMIC-IV and the private JHU PMAP dataset collected at Johns Hopkins University hospital. In addition, the extrinsic hallucination rates are reduced by 44.4 percent after training. Collectively, our findings highlight both the potential of multimodal reasoning-based clinical foundation models and the critical next steps required to make them robust and reliable for real-world deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02945-3
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QoQ-Med3: a multimodal reasoning foundation model for clinical analysis

Farzan Vahedifard, Robert Stevens, Haowen Wei, Paul Liang et al.
npj Digital Medicine
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

QoQ-Med3: a multimodal reasoning foundation model for clinical analysis

Farzan Vahedifard, Robert Stevens, Haowen Wei, Paul Liang, Carl Harris, Jiaee Cheong, Suchi Saria, David Dai, Jeannie She, Xing Han
article en

Abstract

Multimodal reasoning-based foundation models (MRFMs) hold considerable promise for addressing key challenges in medical practice, yet their readiness for real-world deployment remains insufficiently explored. To bridge this gap, we developed two MRFMs (QoQ-Med3 and QoQ-Med3-MIMIC) and systematically evaluated their (i) generalizability to previously unseen clinical modalities and tasks, (ii) transferability to held-out datasets collected across different clinical sites, and (iii) robustness to real-world challenges like cross-site heterogeneity. Our results demonstrate that these models can learn transferable representations across modalities, tasks, and heterogeneous clinical datasets. QoQ-Med3 achieves an overall balanced accuracy of 71.3% and a F1 of 0.349, superceding all open-source and closed-source models, including GPT-4o, with particularly pronounced gains in understudied modalities such as ultrasound and mammography. The model trained on public clinical data only generalized to both the held-out MIMIC-IV and the private JHU PMAP dataset collected at Johns Hopkins University hospital. In addition, the extrinsic hallucination rates are reduced by 44.4 percent after training. Collectively, our findings highlight both the potential of multimodal reasoning-based clinical foundation models and the critical next steps required to make them robust and reliable for real-world deployment.

npj Digital Medicine
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), IIT@MIT (US), Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging (US), Human Media (US)
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Nvidia
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.