Where is the global countryside? An (auto)ethnography of bodies in motion

This paper is an autoethnography of the global countryside that treats rurality as a relational and embodied condition produced through movement between rural worlds. Drawing on ethnographic experience in rural southern Italy and rural Tanzania, I argue that mobility between rural worlds generates forms of knowledge that cannot be captured through single-site methodologies. I advance three main claims: first, the global countryside is not a place but a condition emerging through circulation, comparison and uneven temporalities across rural worlds; second, the researcher’s body functions as both an affective and interpretive epistemic device through which memory, encounter and embodied comparison produce insight; third, autoethnography generates situated knowledge by making visible the embodied and positional conditions through which rural life becomes knowable. The analysis unfolds through four shifting embodied positions – the present body, the absent body, the returning body and the nostalgic body – each revealing different dimensions of rural life structured by migration, memory and moral evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cultural Geographies
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14744740261470826
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where is the global countryside? An (auto)ethnography of bodies in motion

Antonio Allegretti
Cultural Geographies
Rural development and sustainability
article

Where is the global countryside? An (auto)ethnography of bodies in motion

Antonio Allegretti
article en

Abstract

This paper is an autoethnography of the global countryside that treats rurality as a relational and embodied condition produced through movement between rural worlds. Drawing on ethnographic experience in rural southern Italy and rural Tanzania, I argue that mobility between rural worlds generates forms of knowledge that cannot be captured through single-site methodologies. I advance three main claims: first, the global countryside is not a place but a condition emerging through circulation, comparison and uneven temporalities across rural worlds; second, the researcher’s body functions as both an affective and interpretive epistemic device through which memory, encounter and embodied comparison produce insight; third, autoethnography generates situated knowledge by making visible the embodied and positional conditions through which rural life becomes knowable. The analysis unfolds through four shifting embodied positions – the present body, the absent body, the returning body and the nostalgic body – each revealing different dimensions of rural life structured by migration, memory and moral evaluation.

Cultural Geographies
Lancaster University (GB)
Royal Geographical Society
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Rural development and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.