Exploring differences in conceptual models of general self-efficacy between employed and non-employed adults with physical impairments

This study examined a conceptual model explaining general self-efficacy (GSE) in adults with physical impairments and explored whether the structural associations differed by employment status. A total of 1787 participants were included. The model incorporated discrimination, self-esteem, disability acceptance, social participation, and GSE. Path analysis was conducted to test the conceptual relationships, and multi-group analysis assessed moderation by employment status. GSE was significantly associated with self-esteem, disability acceptance, and social participation in both groups. However, employment status was associated with different group-specific patterns of structural associations. The associations of self-esteem and social participation with GSE were stronger among non-employed adults than employed adults, and the model explained a greater proportion of variance in GSE in the non-employed group. These findings suggest that the associations among discrimination, psychosocial factors, and GSE vary by employment status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053261463113
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring differences in conceptual models of general self-efficacy between employed and non-employed adults with physical impairments

Justin A. Haegele, Byungmo Ku, Jung Min Lee
Journal of Health Psychology
Disability Education and Employment
article

Exploring differences in conceptual models of general self-efficacy between employed and non-employed adults with physical impairments

Justin A. Haegele, Byungmo Ku, Jung Min Lee
article en

Abstract

This study examined a conceptual model explaining general self-efficacy (GSE) in adults with physical impairments and explored whether the structural associations differed by employment status. A total of 1787 participants were included. The model incorporated discrimination, self-esteem, disability acceptance, social participation, and GSE. Path analysis was conducted to test the conceptual relationships, and multi-group analysis assessed moderation by employment status. GSE was significantly associated with self-esteem, disability acceptance, and social participation in both groups. However, employment status was associated with different group-specific patterns of structural associations. The associations of self-esteem and social participation with GSE were stronger among non-employed adults than employed adults, and the model explained a greater proportion of variance in GSE in the non-employed group. These findings suggest that the associations among discrimination, psychosocial factors, and GSE vary by employment status.

Journal of Health Psychology
Yong In University (KR), Kyung Hee University (KR), Old Dominion University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Disability Education and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.