Star Ratings and Willingness to Travel for Hospital Care

Choosing a hospital for elective inpatient care is a complex decision due to pervasive information asymmetries and multidimensional quality attributes. Online reviews provide an accessible and salient source of hospital quality information that could influence patient choices. Using the universe of hospital Yelp reviews and inpatient claims data for elective procedures in Florida (2012-2017), we exploit exogenous variation in online ratings to estimate the causal effect of online reviews on hospital selection. Depending on the underlying condition, we find that patients are willing to travel 7.9% farther for labor and delivery and 33.5% farther for orthopedic surgery for a one-standard-deviation increase in a hospital's rating percentile rank within its market, which is roughly a half-star increase. The larger response for orthopedic procedures is consistent with greater reliance on online information when provider relationships are weaker. Falsification tests on emergency admissions yield null results, confirming that online reviews influence elective rather than urgent decision-making. Our findings highlight the role of consumer-generated information in healthcare markets and suggest that online platforms can meaningfully shape provider competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Economics
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70138
Primary Topic
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Star Ratings and Willingness to Travel for Hospital Care

Ian McCarthy, Leonardo Sánchez‐Aragón, Kaylyn Sanbower
Health Economics
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
article

Star Ratings and Willingness to Travel for Hospital Care

Ian McCarthy, Leonardo Sánchez‐Aragón, Kaylyn Sanbower
article en

Abstract

Choosing a hospital for elective inpatient care is a complex decision due to pervasive information asymmetries and multidimensional quality attributes. Online reviews provide an accessible and salient source of hospital quality information that could influence patient choices. Using the universe of hospital Yelp reviews and inpatient claims data for elective procedures in Florida (2012-2017), we exploit exogenous variation in online ratings to estimate the causal effect of online reviews on hospital selection. Depending on the underlying condition, we find that patients are willing to travel 7.9% farther for labor and delivery and 33.5% farther for orthopedic surgery for a one-standard-deviation increase in a hospital's rating percentile rank within its market, which is roughly a half-star increase. The larger response for orthopedic procedures is consistent with greater reliance on online information when provider relationships are weaker. Falsification tests on emergency admissions yield null results, confirming that online reviews influence elective rather than urgent decision-making. Our findings highlight the role of consumer-generated information in healthcare markets and suggest that online platforms can meaningfully shape provider competition.

Health Economics
United States Department of Justice (US), Emory University (US), Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral (EC)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.