Collaboration in a new wrapping: A qualitative case study of governance capacity and legitimacy in Norwegian Healthcare Communities

Focusing on varying capacities and forms of legitimacy, this qualitative case study examines the Norwegian concept of Healthcare Communities (Helsefellesskap), aiming to enhance coherence and resource efficiency in health services. Based on documents and interviews with 13 key informants, the study reveals that while county-wide collaboration committees struggle with conflicting interests, local committees demonstrate greater capacity and legitimacy. Despite some variation, key enablers include dialogue that fosters mutual understanding and commitment, decision-making authority, and relational bonds developed through regular interaction. Concrete projects may shift the focus from questioning collaboration to making it work. The findings are relevant for policymakers and health leaders, highlighting the impact of aligning collaboration with stakeholder interests, and enabling local adaptation. The study contributes to the academic discussion by deepening the understanding of how collaborative governance can balance centralized policy frameworks with decentralized, flexible practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103324
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaboration in a new wrapping: A qualitative case study of governance capacity and legitimacy in Norwegian Healthcare Communities

Lena Bjørge Waage, Roar Eilev Amdam
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Collaboration in a new wrapping: A qualitative case study of governance capacity and legitimacy in Norwegian Healthcare Communities

Lena Bjørge Waage, Roar Eilev Amdam
article en

Abstract

Focusing on varying capacities and forms of legitimacy, this qualitative case study examines the Norwegian concept of Healthcare Communities (Helsefellesskap), aiming to enhance coherence and resource efficiency in health services. Based on documents and interviews with 13 key informants, the study reveals that while county-wide collaboration committees struggle with conflicting interests, local committees demonstrate greater capacity and legitimacy. Despite some variation, key enablers include dialogue that fosters mutual understanding and commitment, decision-making authority, and relational bonds developed through regular interaction. Concrete projects may shift the focus from questioning collaboration to making it work. The findings are relevant for policymakers and health leaders, highlighting the impact of aligning collaboration with stakeholder interests, and enabling local adaptation. The study contributes to the academic discussion by deepening the understanding of how collaborative governance can balance centralized policy frameworks with decentralized, flexible practices.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 14
Volda University College (NO), Ålesund Hospital (NO)
Høgskulen i Volda
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.