Accentuated Eccentric Loading Increases Maximal Countermovement Jump Height Without Changes in Overall Lower Limb Kinetics and Energetics

This study aimed to determine the mechanical and energetic responses to accentuated eccentric loading (AEL) during maximal countermovement jumps (CMJ) and examined potential mechanisms underlying performance enhancement relative to bodyweight CMJs. We hypothesized that increased lower limb forces during loading would enhance positive work output during push-off. Fifteen recreationally active men with good jumping ability (22.3 ± 4.5 years, 1.85 ± 0.06 m, and 79.1 ± 9.6 kg) performed maximal CMJ with and without AEL using handheld dumbbells equivalent to 20% body mass. Compared with bodyweight CMJs, AEL CMJ increased (p < 0.05) effective jump height (d = 0.521), center-of-mass work (d = 0.405), mean vertical ground reaction force (d = 0.346), peak (d = 0.864) and mean (d = 0.647) center-of-mass velocity, and peak (d = 0.497) and mean (d = 0.541) center-of-mass power during the propulsive phase. Effective jump height increased by 2.1 cm with AEL (0.548 ± 0.046 m) compared with bodyweight CMJs (0.527 ± 0.036 m). However, total lower-limb joint work during push-off, squat depth, and most lower-limb electromyography parameters did not differ between conditions. Right ankle peak power and work during push-off were lower with AEL, indicating a reduced ankle contribution despite improved jump height. These results do not support the claim that AEL enhances lower-limb work output. Instead, increased center-of-mass work may have originated from segments not included in the joint-level analysis, such as the trunk and upper body. Our findings suggest the hypothesis that altered whole-body coordination, rather than greater lower-limb work, contributed to the performance enhancement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Sport Science
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsc.70228
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accentuated Eccentric Loading Increases Maximal Countermovement Jump Height Without Changes in Overall Lower Limb Kinetics and Energetics

Timothy J. Carroll, Dominic J. Farris, Eric Yung-Sheng Su, Glen A. Lichtwark
European Journal of Sport Science
Sports Performance and Training
article

Accentuated Eccentric Loading Increases Maximal Countermovement Jump Height Without Changes in Overall Lower Limb Kinetics and Energetics

Timothy J. Carroll, Dominic J. Farris, Eric Yung-Sheng Su, Glen A. Lichtwark
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the mechanical and energetic responses to accentuated eccentric loading (AEL) during maximal countermovement jumps (CMJ) and examined potential mechanisms underlying performance enhancement relative to bodyweight CMJs. We hypothesized that increased lower limb forces during loading would enhance positive work output during push-off. Fifteen recreationally active men with good jumping ability (22.3 ± 4.5 years, 1.85 ± 0.06 m, and 79.1 ± 9.6 kg) performed maximal CMJ with and without AEL using handheld dumbbells equivalent to 20% body mass. Compared with bodyweight CMJs, AEL CMJ increased (p < 0.05) effective jump height (d = 0.521), center-of-mass work (d = 0.405), mean vertical ground reaction force (d = 0.346), peak (d = 0.864) and mean (d = 0.647) center-of-mass velocity, and peak (d = 0.497) and mean (d = 0.541) center-of-mass power during the propulsive phase. Effective jump height increased by 2.1 cm with AEL (0.548 ± 0.046 m) compared with bodyweight CMJs (0.527 ± 0.036 m). However, total lower-limb joint work during push-off, squat depth, and most lower-limb electromyography parameters did not differ between conditions. Right ankle peak power and work during push-off were lower with AEL, indicating a reduced ankle contribution despite improved jump height. These results do not support the claim that AEL enhances lower-limb work output. Instead, increased center-of-mass work may have originated from segments not included in the joint-level analysis, such as the trunk and upper body. Our findings suggest the hypothesis that altered whole-body coordination, rather than greater lower-limb work, contributed to the performance enhancement.

European Journal of Sport ScienceVol. 26(8)
Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Exeter (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.