Cochlear Health Monitoring Post-Cochlear Implantation Reveals Biomarkers for Hearing Outcomes

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to elucidate the timing and mechanisms associated with postoperative residual hearing loss following cochlear implantation and to assess the feasibility of clinical tools designed for prospective cochlear health monitoring. DESIGN: A prospective clinical cohort investigation was conducted utilizing patient-administered in-home cochlear health monitoring to track electrocochleography (ECochG) and four-point impedance (4PI) fluctuations during the first three postoperative months. RESULTS: The study included 32 subjects who completed the in-home testing over the first 3 months following cochlear implantation. ECochG markers identified during real-time ECochG monitoring of electrode insertion correlated with poorer hearing preservation outcomes (Skarzynski hearing preservation scores [mean hearing preservation: 56.88 versus 38.91%, p = 0.0328]) and higher impedances recorded on in-home testing (peak median 4PI: 398.46 Ω versus 270.75 Ω, p = 0.0478). Drops in cochlear microphonic (CM) amplitude detected through in-home monitoring were associated with poorer hearing preservation (mean LFPTM loss: 31.45 versus 11.78 dB, p = 0.0003) and higher impedance values (431.3 Ω versus 262.9 Ω, p = 0.0047). The study identified significant markers of hearing preservation in CM amplitude and 4PI, detectable through postoperative in-home monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-initiated in-home monitoring of cochlear health biomarkers is feasible and provides valuable insights into the recovery of inner ear function following CI. The identified markers, CM amplitude, and 4PI have the potential to personalize postoperative care and improve hearing preservation outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ear and Hearing
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001866
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cochlear Health Monitoring Post-Cochlear Implantation Reveals Biomarkers for Hearing Outcomes

Eren Tan, Aaron M. Collins, William G. Shute, Stephen J. O’Leary et al.
Ear and Hearing
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Cochlear Health Monitoring Post-Cochlear Implantation Reveals Biomarkers for Hearing Outcomes

Eren Tan, Aaron M. Collins, William G. Shute, Stephen J. O’Leary, Christofer Bester
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to elucidate the timing and mechanisms associated with postoperative residual hearing loss following cochlear implantation and to assess the feasibility of clinical tools designed for prospective cochlear health monitoring. DESIGN: A prospective clinical cohort investigation was conducted utilizing patient-administered in-home cochlear health monitoring to track electrocochleography (ECochG) and four-point impedance (4PI) fluctuations during the first three postoperative months. RESULTS: The study included 32 subjects who completed the in-home testing over the first 3 months following cochlear implantation. ECochG markers identified during real-time ECochG monitoring of electrode insertion correlated with poorer hearing preservation outcomes (Skarzynski hearing preservation scores [mean hearing preservation: 56.88 versus 38.91%, p = 0.0328]) and higher impedances recorded on in-home testing (peak median 4PI: 398.46 Ω versus 270.75 Ω, p = 0.0478). Drops in cochlear microphonic (CM) amplitude detected through in-home monitoring were associated with poorer hearing preservation (mean LFPTM loss: 31.45 versus 11.78 dB, p = 0.0003) and higher impedance values (431.3 Ω versus 262.9 Ω, p = 0.0047). The study identified significant markers of hearing preservation in CM amplitude and 4PI, detectable through postoperative in-home monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-initiated in-home monitoring of cochlear health biomarkers is feasible and provides valuable insights into the recovery of inner ear function following CI. The identified markers, CM amplitude, and 4PI have the potential to personalize postoperative care and improve hearing preservation outcomes.

Ear and Hearing
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cochlear Health Monitoring Post-Cochlear Implantation Reveals Biomarkers for Hearing Outcomes — Eren Tan, Aaron M. Collins, et al. · Ear and Hearing (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS