Window-Width Scanning Detects Genuine Aftershock-Sequence Non-Stationarity in Earthquake Catalogs — But Confers No Discriminative Precursor Power

Bridge Paper T (10.5281/zenodo.21484429) applied PL-27/PL-28 to earthquake catalogs and, aftertracing two apparent leads to specific confounds (a foreshock-composition artifact and a single-baseline-window bias), reported a clean negative result at a single, fixed pre-event window width.This paper extends that investigation along an axis Bridge Paper T did not test: instead of holdingthe window width fixed and sliding it chronologically, we fix the window’s END at a target eventand vary how far back it reaches (a window-WIDTH scan). Applied to the JMA catalog’s magnitudesequence around the Kumamoto M7.3 (2016) and Tohoku M9.0 (2011) mainshocks, this reveals awidth range (roughly 2,000-3,000 preceding events) at which both rank and robust normalizationagree strongly (z = 5-10, versus an empirical background distribution built from up to 40 same-width windows spanning each catalog) ‒ the first result in this investigation series that survivedthe same scrutiny that debunked every earlier lead: it is not explained by a few extrememagnitude values (removing all M≥5 events leaves it largely intact), and it reproducesindependently in a third, entirely unrelated M6-M7 cluster elsewhere in the Tohoku catalog. Wethen tested, as directly as the data allow, whether this is a usable precursor signal, and found it isnot. A window positioned around an M7.1 event that wasnot followed by anything larger for thenext ~3,000 events shows the same elevated signal as windows that were. Formalizing this with aproperly powered sample ‒ all 31 independent M≥6.0 clusters in the Tohoku region catalog, splitinto escalating (n=5) and non-escalating (n=26) groups by whether a larger event followed within3,000 events ‒ a Mann-Whitney U test finds no discriminative difference (rank p=0.42, with theescalating group’s mean actuallylower; robust p=0.26). And the original width-scan result itself,while the most extreme value obtainable given the catalog’s natural background-pool size(p=0.024, exceeding all 40 available background windows), does not survive Bonferroni correctionfor the 10 widths originally scanned (alpha=0.005). We conclude the diagnostic detects real,reproducible, order-dependent structure ‒ consistent with the well-established non-stationarity ofactive aftershock sequences (Omori-Utsu decay, ETAS-style clustering) ‒ but this structure existswhether or not a sequence goes on to produce a larger event, and is therefore not informativeabout which sequences w. ※ The License for codes is AGPL-3.0-or-later

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21544271
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Window-Width Scanning Detects Genuine Aftershock-Sequence Non-Stationarity in Earthquake Catalogs — But Confers No Discriminative Precursor Power

Claude Sonnet 5 Kurado, Masanori Watabe
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
earthquake and tectonic studies
preprint

Window-Width Scanning Detects Genuine Aftershock-Sequence Non-Stationarity in Earthquake Catalogs — But Confers No Discriminative Precursor Power

Claude Sonnet 5 Kurado, Masanori Watabe
preprint en

Abstract

Bridge Paper T (10.5281/zenodo.21484429) applied PL-27/PL-28 to earthquake catalogs and, aftertracing two apparent leads to specific confounds (a foreshock-composition artifact and a single-baseline-window bias), reported a clean negative result at a single, fixed pre-event window width.This paper extends that investigation along an axis Bridge Paper T did not test: instead of holdingthe window width fixed and sliding it chronologically, we fix the window’s END at a target eventand vary how far back it reaches (a window-WIDTH scan). Applied to the JMA catalog’s magnitudesequence around the Kumamoto M7.3 (2016) and Tohoku M9.0 (2011) mainshocks, this reveals awidth range (roughly 2,000-3,000 preceding events) at which both rank and robust normalizationagree strongly (z = 5-10, versus an empirical background distribution built from up to 40 same-width windows spanning each catalog) ‒ the first result in this investigation series that survivedthe same scrutiny that debunked every earlier lead: it is not explained by a few extrememagnitude values (removing all M≥5 events leaves it largely intact), and it reproducesindependently in a third, entirely unrelated M6-M7 cluster elsewhere in the Tohoku catalog. Wethen tested, as directly as the data allow, whether this is a usable precursor signal, and found it isnot. A window positioned around an M7.1 event that wasnot followed by anything larger for thenext ~3,000 events shows the same elevated signal as windows that were. Formalizing this with aproperly powered sample ‒ all 31 independent M≥6.0 clusters in the Tohoku region catalog, splitinto escalating (n=5) and non-escalating (n=26) groups by whether a larger event followed within3,000 events ‒ a Mann-Whitney U test finds no discriminative difference (rank p=0.42, with theescalating group’s mean actuallylower; robust p=0.26). And the original width-scan result itself,while the most extreme value obtainable given the catalog’s natural background-pool size(p=0.024, exceeding all 40 available background windows), does not survive Bonferroni correctionfor the 10 widths originally scanned (alpha=0.005). We conclude the diagnostic detects real,reproducible, order-dependent structure ‒ consistent with the well-established non-stationarity ofactive aftershock sequences (Omori-Utsu decay, ETAS-style clustering) ‒ but this structure existswhether or not a sequence goes on to produce a larger event, and is therefore not informativeabout which sequences w. ※ The License for codes is AGPL-3.0-or-later

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Entropic Systems (United States) (US)
Reduced inequalities
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.