In-person therapist-delivered hypnotherapy versus smartphone-based self-guided hypnotherapy in IBS: a multicentre three-armed randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Hypnotherapy is an evidence-based therapy recommended for IBS, but access to therapist-led hypnotherapy is limited by costs and availability. OBJECTIVE: We studied the effectiveness of smartphone-based self-guided hypnotherapy versus in-person therapist-delivered hypnotherapy. DESIGN: This multicentre, three-armed non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (RCT) included patients with IBS (Rome IV, 16-75 years). Patients were randomised to 12-week in-person therapist-delivered hypnotherapy, smartphone-based self-guided hypnotherapy or online self-guided psychoeducation. The primary endpoint was abdominal pain response per Food and Drug Administration (FDA) definition (≥30% reduction from baseline in weekly average of worst daily abdominal pain in at least 2 out of 4 weeks follow-up). The non-inferiority margin was 10%. Secondary endpoints included ≥50 points IBS-symptom severity scale reduction and changes in psychological symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 230 patients (mean±SD age 38.2±13.8 years, 70.4% female) were randomised. FDA abdominal pain response rates were 48% for in-person therapist-delivered hypnotherapy, 33% for smartphone-based self-guided hypnotherapy and 22% for psychoeducation. Non-inferiority of online to in-person hypnotherapy could not be shown (-14.7%, 95% CI -29.3% to 0.9%). In-person hypnotherapy was more effective than psychoeducation (OR 3.48, 95% CI 1.68 to 7.20, p<0.001) at week 16, both hypnotherapy groups were more effective at 6-month follow-up (OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.37 to 7.09, p=0.007 and OR 4.68, 95% CI 2.07 to 10.57, p<0.001). There were no significant treatment effects on psychological symptoms between groups. CONCLUSION: This multicentre RCT could not demonstrate non-inferiority of smartphone-based self-guided hypnotherapy compared with in-person therapist-delivered hypnotherapy in reducing abdominal pain. However, substantial response rates for smartphone-based self-guided hypnotherapy highlight its potential as a broadly applicable and cost-effective alternative. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03899779.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gut
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2026-338385
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-person therapist-delivered hypnotherapy versus smartphone-based self-guided hypnotherapy in IBS: a multicentre three-armed randomised controlled trial

Michelle Bosman, Carla E Flik, BJ Witteman, N de Wit et al.
Gut
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

In-person therapist-delivered hypnotherapy versus smartphone-based self-guided hypnotherapy in IBS: a multicentre three-armed randomised controlled trial

Michelle Bosman, Carla E Flik, BJ Witteman, N de Wit, Yanda R. van Rood, Laurens A. van der Waaij, Nikolien Pijnenborg, Cynthia Elderson, Bjorn Winkens, Annieke S de Ruiter, Bertram J T Haarhuis, Andrea M H Bours, Daniel Keszthelyi, Johanna T W Snijkers, Ad A M Masclee
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypnotherapy is an evidence-based therapy recommended for IBS, but access to therapist-led hypnotherapy is limited by costs and availability. OBJECTIVE: We studied the effectiveness of smartphone-based self-guided hypnotherapy versus in-person therapist-delivered hypnotherapy. DESIGN: This multicentre, three-armed non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (RCT) included patients with IBS (Rome IV, 16-75 years). Patients were randomised to 12-week in-person therapist-delivered hypnotherapy, smartphone-based self-guided hypnotherapy or online self-guided psychoeducation. The primary endpoint was abdominal pain response per Food and Drug Administration (FDA) definition (≥30% reduction from baseline in weekly average of worst daily abdominal pain in at least 2 out of 4 weeks follow-up). The non-inferiority margin was 10%. Secondary endpoints included ≥50 points IBS-symptom severity scale reduction and changes in psychological symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 230 patients (mean±SD age 38.2±13.8 years, 70.4% female) were randomised. FDA abdominal pain response rates were 48% for in-person therapist-delivered hypnotherapy, 33% for smartphone-based self-guided hypnotherapy and 22% for psychoeducation. Non-inferiority of online to in-person hypnotherapy could not be shown (-14.7%, 95% CI -29.3% to 0.9%). In-person hypnotherapy was more effective than psychoeducation (OR 3.48, 95% CI 1.68 to 7.20, p<0.001) at week 16, both hypnotherapy groups were more effective at 6-month follow-up (OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.37 to 7.09, p=0.007 and OR 4.68, 95% CI 2.07 to 10.57, p<0.001). There were no significant treatment effects on psychological symptoms between groups. CONCLUSION: This multicentre RCT could not demonstrate non-inferiority of smartphone-based self-guided hypnotherapy compared with in-person therapist-delivered hypnotherapy in reducing abdominal pain. However, substantial response rates for smartphone-based self-guided hypnotherapy highlight its potential as a broadly applicable and cost-effective alternative. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03899779.

Gut
Fryske Akademy (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Martini Ziekenhuis (NL), Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei (NL), Ziekenhuis Bernhoven (NL), Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
ZonMw
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.