Taking back control? Democracy and UK trade policy after Brexit

Abstract During the Brexit referendum the Leave campaign claimed that the UK would be able to regain its sovereignty and ‘take back control’. Trade policy became a particular focus of the Conservative Government’s post-Brexit vision and underpinned the arguments in favour of leaving the customs union. This article evaluates the evolution of trade policymaking in the UK, from the Brexit referendum in 2016 until the Conservative defeat in the general election of 2024, and its consequences for democracy. It utilises two key insights from the framework of new constitutionalism to reveal the democratic deficiencies of the UK’s post-Brexit trade policy. In doing so, it argues that the governance of UK trade policymaking has failed to advance both parliamentary scrutiny and the scope for meaningful input from a range of stakeholders. In addition, the content of the new trade deals signed by the Conservative Government have further eroded democratic control, by undermining the prospects for a regulatory approach that can address the socio-economic and environmental challenges faced by the UK.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Politics
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-026-00310-2
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taking back control? Democracy and UK trade policy after Brexit

Stephen R. Hurt
British Politics
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Taking back control? Democracy and UK trade policy after Brexit

Stephen R. Hurt
article en

Abstract

Abstract During the Brexit referendum the Leave campaign claimed that the UK would be able to regain its sovereignty and ‘take back control’. Trade policy became a particular focus of the Conservative Government’s post-Brexit vision and underpinned the arguments in favour of leaving the customs union. This article evaluates the evolution of trade policymaking in the UK, from the Brexit referendum in 2016 until the Conservative defeat in the general election of 2024, and its consequences for democracy. It utilises two key insights from the framework of new constitutionalism to reveal the democratic deficiencies of the UK’s post-Brexit trade policy. In doing so, it argues that the governance of UK trade policymaking has failed to advance both parliamentary scrutiny and the scope for meaningful input from a range of stakeholders. In addition, the content of the new trade deals signed by the Conservative Government have further eroded democratic control, by undermining the prospects for a regulatory approach that can address the socio-economic and environmental challenges faced by the UK.

British PoliticsVol. 21(1)
Oxford Brookes University (GB)
Oxford Brookes University, British International Studies Association, University of Sussex
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.