Beyond Allyship: Critical Consciousness and Coalition Activism in Support of Black Lives among Latinx and Asian American Students

Following 2020, involvement in social justice movements, such as Black Lives Matter (BLM), has increased, particularly among non-Black allies. Research on psychological mechanisms predicting BLM support has been covered for white people. Our study examined whether critical consciousness, colorblindness, and awareness of white privilege predict BLM-supportive involvement among Latine and Asian individuals in a diverse college sample. Using an online cross-sectional survey with Latine and Asian college students ( N = 247), we assessed whether critical consciousness, colorblindness, and awareness of white privilege were associated with BLM-supportive involvement. In addition, we conducted exploratory analyses that examined whether ethnoracial identity moderated these associations. Multiple logistic regression illustrated that critical consciousness, colorblindness, and white privilege awareness were significant predictors of BLM involvement. Furthermore, exploratory analyses revealed specific ways in which the predictors of BLM involvement differed across Asian and Latine students. Our research extends previous work on social change through collective action among Latine and Asian college students, providing evidence of the psychological mechanisms that drive social change and BLM activism within two racially minoritized groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Social Science
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19367244261464111
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Allyship: Critical Consciousness and Coalition Activism in Support of Black Lives among Latinx and Asian American Students

Aldo Barrita, Rachael D. Robnett, Gloria Wong‐Padoongpatt, Iván Carbajal
Journal of Applied Social Science
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Beyond Allyship: Critical Consciousness and Coalition Activism in Support of Black Lives among Latinx and Asian American Students

Aldo Barrita, Rachael D. Robnett, Gloria Wong‐Padoongpatt, Iván Carbajal
article en

Abstract

Following 2020, involvement in social justice movements, such as Black Lives Matter (BLM), has increased, particularly among non-Black allies. Research on psychological mechanisms predicting BLM support has been covered for white people. Our study examined whether critical consciousness, colorblindness, and awareness of white privilege predict BLM-supportive involvement among Latine and Asian individuals in a diverse college sample. Using an online cross-sectional survey with Latine and Asian college students ( N = 247), we assessed whether critical consciousness, colorblindness, and awareness of white privilege were associated with BLM-supportive involvement. In addition, we conducted exploratory analyses that examined whether ethnoracial identity moderated these associations. Multiple logistic regression illustrated that critical consciousness, colorblindness, and white privilege awareness were significant predictors of BLM involvement. Furthermore, exploratory analyses revealed specific ways in which the predictors of BLM involvement differed across Asian and Latine students. Our research extends previous work on social change through collective action among Latine and Asian college students, providing evidence of the psychological mechanisms that drive social change and BLM activism within two racially minoritized groups.

Journal of Applied Social Science
Oregon State University (US), University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), Michigan State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.