Scleral Lens Fenestrations and Fluid Reservoir Debris

Abstract Purpose The accumulation of debris within the fluid reservoir during scleral lens wear can adversely affect vision, resulting in the need for lens removal. This study aimed to quantify the effect of incorporating limbal scleral lens fenestrations upon fluid reservoir debris. Methods Twenty healthy adults (mean age 32 ± 11 years, 10 females/10 males) with normal corneas wore non-fenestrated and fenestrated (3 × 1 mm diameter limbal fenestrations separated by 120°) OneFitMed+ scleral lenses (No.7 Contact Lenses) in both eyes (on separate days) for 3 h. All other scleral lens parameters were held constant except for the addition of the fenestrations by the manufacturer. Customised image analysis (MATLAB) was used to quantify central fluid reservoir debris (an average and total intensity metric) from Scheimpflug images of the right eye. Results Fluid reservoir debris increased over time ( p < 0.001), more so for non-fenestrated lenses. After 3 h, the increase in fluid reservoir debris was greater for the non-fenestrated lens design (total metric increase: non-fenestrated 66 ± 21 vs fenestrated 14 ± 7 arbitrary units [ p = 0.03], average metric increase: non-fenestrated 9 ± 2 vs fenestrated 5 ± 1 arbitrary units [ p = 0.07]). There was no significant difference in the magnitude of debris for fenestrated lenses fitted with or without an air bubble ( p = 0.80). There was no association between central corneal oedema and the fluid reservoir intensity metrics for either the fenestrated ( R 2 ≤ 0.08, p ≥ 0.28) or non-fenestrated lenses ( R 2 ≤ 0.001, p ≥ 0.90). Conclusions After 3 h, non-fenestrated lenses displayed a 2 (average metric) to 4.8 times (total metric) greater increase in central fluid reservoir debris than fenestrated lenses. This suggests a potential role for fenestrated lens designs in managing fluid reservoir debris; however, longer-term studies of participants with ocular disease are required. Clinical Trial This study was registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Registration number 12622001164785p), date of registration 24/8/2022.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44402-026-00150-z
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scleral Lens Fenestrations and Fluid Reservoir Debris

David Alonso‐Caneiro, Luisa H. Colorado, Damien Fisher, Stephen J. Vincent
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
article

Scleral Lens Fenestrations and Fluid Reservoir Debris

David Alonso‐Caneiro, Luisa H. Colorado, Damien Fisher, Stephen J. Vincent
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The accumulation of debris within the fluid reservoir during scleral lens wear can adversely affect vision, resulting in the need for lens removal. This study aimed to quantify the effect of incorporating limbal scleral lens fenestrations upon fluid reservoir debris. Methods Twenty healthy adults (mean age 32 ± 11 years, 10 females/10 males) with normal corneas wore non-fenestrated and fenestrated (3 × 1 mm diameter limbal fenestrations separated by 120°) OneFitMed+ scleral lenses (No.7 Contact Lenses) in both eyes (on separate days) for 3 h. All other scleral lens parameters were held constant except for the addition of the fenestrations by the manufacturer. Customised image analysis (MATLAB) was used to quantify central fluid reservoir debris (an average and total intensity metric) from Scheimpflug images of the right eye. Results Fluid reservoir debris increased over time ( p < 0.001), more so for non-fenestrated lenses. After 3 h, the increase in fluid reservoir debris was greater for the non-fenestrated lens design (total metric increase: non-fenestrated 66 ± 21 vs fenestrated 14 ± 7 arbitrary units [ p = 0.03], average metric increase: non-fenestrated 9 ± 2 vs fenestrated 5 ± 1 arbitrary units [ p = 0.07]). There was no significant difference in the magnitude of debris for fenestrated lenses fitted with or without an air bubble ( p = 0.80). There was no association between central corneal oedema and the fluid reservoir intensity metrics for either the fenestrated ( R 2 ≤ 0.08, p ≥ 0.28) or non-fenestrated lenses ( R 2 ≤ 0.001, p ≥ 0.90). Conclusions After 3 h, non-fenestrated lenses displayed a 2 (average metric) to 4.8 times (total metric) greater increase in central fluid reservoir debris than fenestrated lenses. This suggests a potential role for fenestrated lens designs in managing fluid reservoir debris; however, longer-term studies of participants with ocular disease are required. Clinical Trial This study was registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Registration number 12622001164785p), date of registration 24/8/2022.

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Queensland University of Technology (AU), University of the Sunshine Coast (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.