Drought, Structural Breaks, and the Economics of Public Land Grazing: Evidence From the Intermountain West

ABSTRACT This study investigates the decline in Bureau of Land Management (BLM) grazing allotments, authorized Animal Unit Months, across eight Intermountain states (Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming) from 1980 to 2022, examining the role of drought and structural change. Using outlier detection and structural break tests, we identify a concentrated regime shift in the early 2000s, with seven of eight states experiencing a statistically significant break between 2000 and 2003. Post‐break allotments declined by 11% regionally, ranging from 8% in New Mexico to 27% in Colorado. Outlier analysis reveals substantial heterogeneity in the nature of shocks, with Idaho and Utah experiencing permanent level shifts, Colorado a temporary change, and Wyoming multiple shocks of all types. To quantify drought impacts, we estimate a fixed effects model with a lagged dependent variable and a state‐specific structural break dummy. Results show that a one‐unit decrease in the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) reduces allotments by 0.5% immediately and by 3.6% in the long run under sustained drought. The break dummy is negative and highly significant, indicating a permanent 6.5% reduction in allotments following the early 2000s drought that is not explained by drought or market variables alone. This suggests that factors beyond drought have reduced grazing capacity. A sustained severe drought (three‐unit PDSI decrease) would permanently remove approximately 893,000 Animal Unit Months (AUMs) annually from the region, equivalent to 149,000–179,000 cow‐calf pairs and representing between $9 million and $27 million in lost forage value at private lease rates. These findings support reforms to drought relief programs to account for lagged and permanent effects, flexible permitting mechanisms for temporary drought, and long‐term adjustment assistance for permanent reductions. State‐specific heterogeneity in drought impacts implies that, while BLM already administers grazing at state and district levels, further differentiation of drought relief and permit flexibility based on state‐level vulnerabilities may improve effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70117
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drought, Structural Breaks, and the Economics of Public Land Grazing: Evidence From the Intermountain West

Zuyi Wang, Hernan A. Tejeda, Man‐Keun Kim, Thomas R. Harris
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Climate change impacts on agriculture
article

Drought, Structural Breaks, and the Economics of Public Land Grazing: Evidence From the Intermountain West

Zuyi Wang, Hernan A. Tejeda, Man‐Keun Kim, Thomas R. Harris
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the decline in Bureau of Land Management (BLM) grazing allotments, authorized Animal Unit Months, across eight Intermountain states (Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming) from 1980 to 2022, examining the role of drought and structural change. Using outlier detection and structural break tests, we identify a concentrated regime shift in the early 2000s, with seven of eight states experiencing a statistically significant break between 2000 and 2003. Post‐break allotments declined by 11% regionally, ranging from 8% in New Mexico to 27% in Colorado. Outlier analysis reveals substantial heterogeneity in the nature of shocks, with Idaho and Utah experiencing permanent level shifts, Colorado a temporary change, and Wyoming multiple shocks of all types. To quantify drought impacts, we estimate a fixed effects model with a lagged dependent variable and a state‐specific structural break dummy. Results show that a one‐unit decrease in the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) reduces allotments by 0.5% immediately and by 3.6% in the long run under sustained drought. The break dummy is negative and highly significant, indicating a permanent 6.5% reduction in allotments following the early 2000s drought that is not explained by drought or market variables alone. This suggests that factors beyond drought have reduced grazing capacity. A sustained severe drought (three‐unit PDSI decrease) would permanently remove approximately 893,000 Animal Unit Months (AUMs) annually from the region, equivalent to 149,000–179,000 cow‐calf pairs and representing between $9 million and $27 million in lost forage value at private lease rates. These findings support reforms to drought relief programs to account for lagged and permanent effects, flexible permitting mechanisms for temporary drought, and long‐term adjustment assistance for permanent reductions. State‐specific heterogeneity in drought impacts implies that, while BLM already administers grazing at state and district levels, further differentiation of drought relief and permit flexibility based on state‐level vulnerabilities may improve effectiveness.

Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Utah State University (US), University of Nevada, Reno (US), University of Idaho (US), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.