Exploring AI governance for sustainable decision-making: evidence from six case studies

Purpose This study aims to examine how artificial intelligence (AI) governance supports sustainable decision-making across organizational contexts in Europe, focusing on six Portuguese firms in energy, urban mobility and finance. Design/methodology/approach Adopting a sociotechnical perspective, this research uses a qualitative multiple case study design with semi-structured interviews of Chief Information Officers across diverse organizational contexts. It integrates technical and social dimensions to capture how digital infrastructures, governance practices and human factors interact in decision-making processes. Findings The findings reveal that governance increasingly aligns with formal frameworks through policies, dedicated structures, human oversight and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) oriented indicators, enhancing transparency and reliability. However, maturity varies by sector, resources and technology and challenges such as data limitations, organizational resistance and regulatory uncertainty persist. Furthermore, AI governance emerges as an adaptive, iterative capability for navigating sustainability complexities. Originality/value This study provides original insights by linking AI governance to sustainable decision-making through a sociotechnical lens, an area still underexplored in empirical research. It advances theory by integrating ESG considerations into AI governance and offers practical value by identifying mechanisms that enhance transparency, accountability and sustainability outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jeet-04-2026-0023
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring AI governance for sustainable decision-making: evidence from six case studies

Fernando Luís Almeida
Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Exploring AI governance for sustainable decision-making: evidence from six case studies

Fernando Luís Almeida
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how artificial intelligence (AI) governance supports sustainable decision-making across organizational contexts in Europe, focusing on six Portuguese firms in energy, urban mobility and finance. Design/methodology/approach Adopting a sociotechnical perspective, this research uses a qualitative multiple case study design with semi-structured interviews of Chief Information Officers across diverse organizational contexts. It integrates technical and social dimensions to capture how digital infrastructures, governance practices and human factors interact in decision-making processes. Findings The findings reveal that governance increasingly aligns with formal frameworks through policies, dedicated structures, human oversight and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) oriented indicators, enhancing transparency and reliability. However, maturity varies by sector, resources and technology and challenges such as data limitations, organizational resistance and regulatory uncertainty persist. Furthermore, AI governance emerges as an adaptive, iterative capability for navigating sustainability complexities. Originality/value This study provides original insights by linking AI governance to sustainable decision-making through a sociotechnical lens, an area still underexplored in empirical research. It advances theory by integrating ESG considerations into AI governance and offers practical value by identifying mechanisms that enhance transparency, accountability and sustainability outcomes.

Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology
Instituto Superior Politécnico Gaya (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.