Determining Parental Factors for Clinical Trial Attrition in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Despite high enrollment rates on Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocols, attrition after initial consent is challenging, introducing bias and prolonging trial completion. While adult oncology literature has identified predictors of withdrawal, little is known about caregiver decision-making for child participation in trials. This study explored caregiver perspectives on enrollment and attrition in COG trials for B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), and identified factors influencing decision-making and strategies to support retention. METHODS/DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews were conducted at two institutions with 21 caregivers of children who either remained on or withdrew from a therapeutic trial for B-ALL between 2018 and 2024. Inductive reflexive thematic analysis was used with independent dual coding and iterative codebook refinement. RESULTS: Five themes influencing trial decision-making were identified: (1) factors supporting continued participation (retention), including trust in clinical team, belief in scientific benefit, and active information-seeking; (2) opposing factors for consenting to remain on trial (attrition) including emotional overload, logistical and financial burden, fear of harm, and uncertainty regarding treatment efficacy; (3) evolving caregiver decision-making and child involvement over time; (4) perceptions of treatment intensity, including de-escalation concerns; and (5) the need for accessible, re-visitable educational resources to support sustained participation. CONCLUSIONS: Caregiver clinical trial decision-making is dynamic and evolves over time, with emotional burden, logistical challenges, and perceptions of treatment risk driving attrition. Longitudinal communication, simplified and re-visitable consent resources, and interventions that reduce participation burden may improve retention. These findings highlight the importance of supporting caregivers beyond initial consent to optimize retention and support for families.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/1545-5017.70596
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining Parental Factors for Clinical Trial Attrition in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Kellee Parker, Cathy Lee‐Miller, Kimberly L. Stathas, Jakob Q. Weiss
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Determining Parental Factors for Clinical Trial Attrition in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Kellee Parker, Cathy Lee‐Miller, Kimberly L. Stathas, Jakob Q. Weiss
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Despite high enrollment rates on Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocols, attrition after initial consent is challenging, introducing bias and prolonging trial completion. While adult oncology literature has identified predictors of withdrawal, little is known about caregiver decision-making for child participation in trials. This study explored caregiver perspectives on enrollment and attrition in COG trials for B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), and identified factors influencing decision-making and strategies to support retention. METHODS/DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews were conducted at two institutions with 21 caregivers of children who either remained on or withdrew from a therapeutic trial for B-ALL between 2018 and 2024. Inductive reflexive thematic analysis was used with independent dual coding and iterative codebook refinement. RESULTS: Five themes influencing trial decision-making were identified: (1) factors supporting continued participation (retention), including trust in clinical team, belief in scientific benefit, and active information-seeking; (2) opposing factors for consenting to remain on trial (attrition) including emotional overload, logistical and financial burden, fear of harm, and uncertainty regarding treatment efficacy; (3) evolving caregiver decision-making and child involvement over time; (4) perceptions of treatment intensity, including de-escalation concerns; and (5) the need for accessible, re-visitable educational resources to support sustained participation. CONCLUSIONS: Caregiver clinical trial decision-making is dynamic and evolves over time, with emotional burden, logistical challenges, and perceptions of treatment risk driving attrition. Longitudinal communication, simplified and re-visitable consent resources, and interventions that reduce participation burden may improve retention. These findings highlight the importance of supporting caregivers beyond initial consent to optimize retention and support for families.

Pediatric Blood & Cancer
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Utah (US), University of Wisconsin Health (US), Wisconsin Division of Public Health (US)
University of Utah
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.