Evaluating camera survey methods for estimating Eld’s deer abundance in the Hainan Datian National Nature Reserve

Abstract Accurately estimating population abundance is crucial for conserving endangered ungulates like Eld’s deer ( Rucervus eldii ), yet methodological challenges persist in tropical ecosystems. To evaluate different approaches, we compared two camera-trap-based models – spatial mark-resight (SMR) and the random encounter model (REM) – for estimating Eld’s deer abundance in Hainan Datian National Nature Reserve, China, using the same dataset. Model estimates were also referenced against a preliminary belt transect survey count. From October 2021 to January 2022, we deployed 50 camera traps and utilized GPS data from eight collared deer under a closed-population assumption. The SMR model, incorporating spatial capture-recapture data, yielded a density of 18.45 ± 2.21 deer/km 2 . The REM model yielded a lower density estimate of 6.25 ± 0.11 deer/km 2 . Between the two models, the SMR estimates were similar in magnitude to the belt transect survey results (19.78 ± 0.76 deer/km 2 ). Our analysis indicates that SMR provides more robust estimates when marked individuals are available, whereas REM offers a practical solution for unmarked populations but depends critically on variation in encounter rates among camera stations. This comparison highlights the performance characteristics and parametric sensitivities of both models in a tropical context, highlighting the need for careful method selection based on individual identifiability and parameter availability in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mammalia
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2026-0008
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating camera survey methods for estimating Eld’s deer abundance in the Hainan Datian National Nature Reserve

Qi Wang, Wenbo Yan, Mingli Fu, Jiahui Liu et al.
Mammalia
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Evaluating camera survey methods for estimating Eld’s deer abundance in the Hainan Datian National Nature Reserve

Qi Wang, Wenbo Yan, Mingli Fu, Jiahui Liu, Zhigao Zeng
article en

Abstract

Abstract Accurately estimating population abundance is crucial for conserving endangered ungulates like Eld’s deer ( Rucervus eldii ), yet methodological challenges persist in tropical ecosystems. To evaluate different approaches, we compared two camera-trap-based models – spatial mark-resight (SMR) and the random encounter model (REM) – for estimating Eld’s deer abundance in Hainan Datian National Nature Reserve, China, using the same dataset. Model estimates were also referenced against a preliminary belt transect survey count. From October 2021 to January 2022, we deployed 50 camera traps and utilized GPS data from eight collared deer under a closed-population assumption. The SMR model, incorporating spatial capture-recapture data, yielded a density of 18.45 ± 2.21 deer/km 2 . The REM model yielded a lower density estimate of 6.25 ± 0.11 deer/km 2 . Between the two models, the SMR estimates were similar in magnitude to the belt transect survey results (19.78 ± 0.76 deer/km 2 ). Our analysis indicates that SMR provides more robust estimates when marked individuals are available, whereas REM offers a practical solution for unmarked populations but depends critically on variation in encounter rates among camera stations. This comparison highlights the performance characteristics and parametric sensitivities of both models in a tropical context, highlighting the need for careful method selection based on individual identifiability and parameter availability in practice.

Mammalia
Shaanxi University of Technology (CN), Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve (CN), Institute of Zoology (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.