Global perceptions on social work: A scoping review

Abstract Public perceptions of social work shape trust, legitimacy and the profession’s capacity to advocate for social justice, yet these perceptions remain poorly understood across global contexts. This scoping review synthesises 32 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and October 2025 to examine (1) how social workers believe they are perceived, (2) public views on social work, and (3) perspectives of professionals and stakeholders, including media and clients. Guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, studies were analysed thematically. Five recurring themes were identified: (1) media influence, (2) public knowledge gaps, (3) trust, (4) social workers’ perceptions of public views, and (5) strategies for shaping perceptions. Despite wide variation in practice contexts, the review found global similarities across these themes, with contextual factors shaping nuance rather than fundamentally different patterns of perception. Public perceptions were shaped by historical and ideological forces as much as by individual encounters with social workers. The findings highlight the need for internationally relevant strategies to strengthen professional visibility and legitimacy. Improving understanding and trust requires increased public engagement alongside critical reflection within the profession, ensuring social workers are recognised as knowledgeable advocates who address structural inequities while supporting individuals, families and communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Social Work
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcag131
Primary Topic
Social Work Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global perceptions on social work: A scoping review

Barbara Staniforth, Ulene Schiller, Helen Hickson, Natasha Long et al.
The British Journal of Social Work
Social Work Education and Practice
article

Global perceptions on social work: A scoping review

Barbara Staniforth, Ulene Schiller, Helen Hickson, Natasha Long, Corina Modderman, Margo Trappenburg
article en

Abstract

Abstract Public perceptions of social work shape trust, legitimacy and the profession’s capacity to advocate for social justice, yet these perceptions remain poorly understood across global contexts. This scoping review synthesises 32 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and October 2025 to examine (1) how social workers believe they are perceived, (2) public views on social work, and (3) perspectives of professionals and stakeholders, including media and clients. Guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, studies were analysed thematically. Five recurring themes were identified: (1) media influence, (2) public knowledge gaps, (3) trust, (4) social workers’ perceptions of public views, and (5) strategies for shaping perceptions. Despite wide variation in practice contexts, the review found global similarities across these themes, with contextual factors shaping nuance rather than fundamentally different patterns of perception. Public perceptions were shaped by historical and ideological forces as much as by individual encounters with social workers. The findings highlight the need for internationally relevant strategies to strengthen professional visibility and legitimacy. Improving understanding and trust requires increased public engagement alongside critical reflection within the profession, ensuring social workers are recognised as knowledgeable advocates who address structural inequities while supporting individuals, families and communities.

The British Journal of Social Work
University of Fort Hare (ZA), University of Auckland (NZ), Utrecht University (NL), La Trobe University (AU), Central Queensland University (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social Work Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.