Phylogeny of the subtribe Asterinae (Asteraceae: Astereae): new circumscription for Asterinae and <i>Aster</i> and implications for pappus evolution

Abstract Background The subtribe Asterinae (Asteraceae: Astereae) comprises ∼300 species across 13 genera (including the well-known type genus Aster) with considerable horticultural and ecological importance. The pappus, a key character for dispersal and protection, is highly diverse and taxonomically important in Asterinae. However, the phylogenetic relationships within Asterinae and Aster remain poorly resolved, leading to persistent taxonomic controversies and obscuring the evolutionary history of the pappus morphology. Methods We reconstructed both plastid (using five newly developed markers) and nuclear (using 130,503 SNPs generated from ddRADseq) trees, based on a comprehensive sampling of 119 species representing all 13 genera of Asterinae and allied subtribes. Using these newly obtained trees, we inferred the evolutionary trajectories of pappus morphology across Asterinae. Key Results Both plastid and nuclear SNP trees resolved relationships within Asterinae with strong support. The previously defined Asterinae and Aster were revealed to be polyphyletic, splitting into four (plastid tree) or seven (nuclear SNP tree) clades, respectively. Both trees strongly supported a large clade containing most genera and species of the previously circumscribed Asterinae. Within this large clade, four consistent and highly supported subclades were recovered, while three additional clades were resolved outside of it. Incongruent placements of several taxa between the two trees were detected. Ancestral state reconstruction revealed extensive homoplasy in pappus evolution, undermining taxonomic reliability of the pappus morphology. Conclusions We redefine Asterinae to include only its core clade and recognize a single monophyletic Aster. This revised taxonomy of Asterinae consolidates 16 former genera of Astereae. Additionally, we propose one new subtribe (Chlamyditinae) and four subgenera within Aster—three of which are novel. This framework clarifies the taxonomy of Asterinae and Aster and lays the groundwork for future studies on the evolution of pappus and other characters that may drive the rise of its remarkable species diversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Botany
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcag225
Primary Topic
Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phylogeny of the subtribe Asterinae (Asteraceae: Astereae): new circumscription for Asterinae and Aster and implications for pappus evolution

C L Zhang, Xuejun Ge, FU Zhixi, Goro Kokubugata et al.
Annals of Botany
Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies
article

Phylogeny of the subtribe Asterinae (Asteraceae: Astereae): new circumscription for Asterinae and Aster and implications for pappus evolution

C L Zhang, Xuejun Ge, FU Zhixi, Goro Kokubugata, Meng Wei, Haihua Hu, Luc Brouillet, Akiko Soejima, John C. Semple, J Wang, Guojin Zhang, Jiahao Shen, Guohao Niu, Bohan Jiao, Tiangang Gao, Manana Khutsishvili
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The subtribe Asterinae (Asteraceae: Astereae) comprises ∼300 species across 13 genera (including the well-known type genus Aster) with considerable horticultural and ecological importance. The pappus, a key character for dispersal and protection, is highly diverse and taxonomically important in Asterinae. However, the phylogenetic relationships within Asterinae and Aster remain poorly resolved, leading to persistent taxonomic controversies and obscuring the evolutionary history of the pappus morphology. Methods We reconstructed both plastid (using five newly developed markers) and nuclear (using 130,503 SNPs generated from ddRADseq) trees, based on a comprehensive sampling of 119 species representing all 13 genera of Asterinae and allied subtribes. Using these newly obtained trees, we inferred the evolutionary trajectories of pappus morphology across Asterinae. Key Results Both plastid and nuclear SNP trees resolved relationships within Asterinae with strong support. The previously defined Asterinae and Aster were revealed to be polyphyletic, splitting into four (plastid tree) or seven (nuclear SNP tree) clades, respectively. Both trees strongly supported a large clade containing most genera and species of the previously circumscribed Asterinae. Within this large clade, four consistent and highly supported subclades were recovered, while three additional clades were resolved outside of it. Incongruent placements of several taxa between the two trees were detected. Ancestral state reconstruction revealed extensive homoplasy in pappus evolution, undermining taxonomic reliability of the pappus morphology. Conclusions We redefine Asterinae to include only its core clade and recognize a single monophyletic Aster. This revised taxonomy of Asterinae consolidates 16 former genera of Astereae. Additionally, we propose one new subtribe (Chlamyditinae) and four subgenera within Aster—three of which are novel. This framework clarifies the taxonomy of Asterinae and Aster and lays the groundwork for future studies on the evolution of pappus and other characters that may drive the rise of its remarkable species diversity.

Annals of Botany
University of Waterloo (CA), Hunan Normal University (CN), Ilia State University (GE), Cégep Marie-Victorin (CA), South China Botanical Garden (CN), Queensland Department of Environment and Science (AU), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany (CZ), National Museum of Nature and Science (JP), Institute of Botany (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Sichuan Normal University (CN), Kumamoto University (JP)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.