Leisure Guilt

Across four studies, we investigate a novel psychological construct: leisure guilt-the feeling of guilt or unease about spending time leisurely rather than productively-and examine its links to daily leisure and well-being. In Studies 1a to 1c, we developed and validated the Leisure Guilt Proneness (LGP) Scale, which is internally consistent, stable over time, and predictive of poorer leisure experiences and lower well-being. In Study 2, we employed the experience sampling method to capture leisure guilt dynamics in everyday life. On average, people experienced leisure guilt during 14% of leisure occasions, with higher rates among women, individuals with lower socioeconomic status, and younger adults. Leisure type also mattered: leisure guilt was more common during solitary than social leisure. Lastly, individuals high in LGP reported experiencing reduced psychological benefits from leisure. Our findings identify leisure guilt as a potential barrier to the psychological benefits of leisure and daily well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672261462977
Primary Topic
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leisure Guilt

Stefan Stieger, Paul K. Piff, Azim Shariff, Hyunjin J. Koo et al.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
article

Leisure Guilt

Stefan Stieger, Paul K. Piff, Azim Shariff, Hyunjin J. Koo, Friedrich M. Götz
article en

Abstract

Across four studies, we investigate a novel psychological construct: leisure guilt-the feeling of guilt or unease about spending time leisurely rather than productively-and examine its links to daily leisure and well-being. In Studies 1a to 1c, we developed and validated the Leisure Guilt Proneness (LGP) Scale, which is internally consistent, stable over time, and predictive of poorer leisure experiences and lower well-being. In Study 2, we employed the experience sampling method to capture leisure guilt dynamics in everyday life. On average, people experienced leisure guilt during 14% of leisure occasions, with higher rates among women, individuals with lower socioeconomic status, and younger adults. Leisure type also mattered: leisure guilt was more common during solitary than social leisure. Lastly, individuals high in LGP reported experiencing reduced psychological benefits from leisure. Our findings identify leisure guilt as a potential barrier to the psychological benefits of leisure and daily well-being.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
University of British Columbia (CA), University of California, Irvine (US), California State University, San Marcos (US), Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences (AT)
Canada Foundation for Innovation, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.