Implementation strategies used in clinical practice guidelines in older adults’ mental health and neurocognitive conditions: a scoping review

Caring for older adults with mental health conditions including neurocognitive conditions is complex. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are intended to improve care for such conditions in older adults. This scoping review sought to systematically identify, synthesize, map evidence and identify the gaps in implementation strategies used in the implementation of CPGs for mental health conditions in older adults including neurocognitive conditions. This scoping review was conducted using the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis methods for scoping reviews. Six research databases (Ageline, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycINFO, JBI EBP) and grey literature were searched. Inclusion criteria for the articles were adults 65 and older and focused on older adults mental health and neurocognitive conditions. Strategies to the implementation of CPGs were categorized using the Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) framework. A total of three articles were identified in this scoping review. Reported implementation strategies were tailored to providers, were educational, and interdisciplinary collaboration. CPGs length, perceived weakness of evidence, and providers’ perception of relevance to patients were noted as challenges to implementing CPGs. Our search results demonstrated a paucity of literature with only three peer reviewed studies located. Despite the limited available literature, this review contributes to guideline to practice gap literature by synthesizing and identifying potentially effective implementation strategies. We make recommendations about how to potentially improve adherence to clinical practice guidelines that could be implemented by researchers, healthcare providers, and health systems policy decision makers to improve our healthcare systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-08005-5
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation strategies used in clinical practice guidelines in older adults’ mental health and neurocognitive conditions: a scoping review

Dallas Seitz, Fardowsa Halane, Jessie McGowan, Jennifer Watt et al.
BMC Geriatrics
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
article

Implementation strategies used in clinical practice guidelines in older adults’ mental health and neurocognitive conditions: a scoping review

Dallas Seitz, Fardowsa Halane, Jessie McGowan, Jennifer Watt, Stacey Hatch
article en

Abstract

Caring for older adults with mental health conditions including neurocognitive conditions is complex. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are intended to improve care for such conditions in older adults. This scoping review sought to systematically identify, synthesize, map evidence and identify the gaps in implementation strategies used in the implementation of CPGs for mental health conditions in older adults including neurocognitive conditions. This scoping review was conducted using the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis methods for scoping reviews. Six research databases (Ageline, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycINFO, JBI EBP) and grey literature were searched. Inclusion criteria for the articles were adults 65 and older and focused on older adults mental health and neurocognitive conditions. Strategies to the implementation of CPGs were categorized using the Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) framework. A total of three articles were identified in this scoping review. Reported implementation strategies were tailored to providers, were educational, and interdisciplinary collaboration. CPGs length, perceived weakness of evidence, and providers’ perception of relevance to patients were noted as challenges to implementing CPGs. Our search results demonstrated a paucity of literature with only three peer reviewed studies located. Despite the limited available literature, this review contributes to guideline to practice gap literature by synthesizing and identifying potentially effective implementation strategies. We make recommendations about how to potentially improve adherence to clinical practice guidelines that could be implemented by researchers, healthcare providers, and health systems policy decision makers to improve our healthcare systems.

BMC Geriatrics
Western University (CA), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Yorkville University (CA)
Institute of Aging
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.