Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Rectilinear Biphasic Waveform and Biphasic Truncated Exponential Waveform Shocks for Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation

Background No adequately powered prospective studies have compared the safety and efficacy of rectilinear biphasic waveform (RBW) shocks and biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) shocks for direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. The study objective was to compare the efficacy of first shock direct current cardioversion from atrial fibrillation to normal sinus rhythm using a full‐output 200J RBW synchronized shock or a full‐output 360J BTE synchronized shock. Methods This investigator‐initiated, open‐label, unblinded, randomized controlled trial was performed at 3 hospitals in the Inova Health System between July 2023 and July 2024. Adult patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation were randomized 1:1 to full‐output shock using a 200J RBW or 360J BTE shock waveform defibrillator. ECGs were performed before and 1 minute after each shock and adjudicated by a board‐certified electrophysiologist blinded to treatment assignment. Skin pads were positioned in an anterolateral placement in all patients. Successful direct current cardioversion was defined as normal sinus rhythm on 12‐lead ECG obtained ≥1 minute after shock delivery. Results A total of 546 unique patients were eligible for randomization, 270 patients were randomized to a 200J RBW shock and 276 patients to a 360J BTE shock. Normal sinus rhythm ≥1 minute after first shock delivery occurred in 223/270 (82.6%) patients randomized to 200J RBW shock and in 233/276 (84.4%) patients randomized to 360J BTE shock ( P =0.565). Overall, there were no significant differences in the frequency of attaining normal sinus rhythm after multiple direct current cardioversion shocks or safety events between patients randomized to 200J RBW or 360J BTE shocks. Conclusions We observed no difference in safety or efficacy between full‐output RBW or BTE shocks for atrial fibrillation cardioversion. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT05992623.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.125.042938
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Rectilinear Biphasic Waveform and Biphasic Truncated Exponential Waveform Shocks for Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation

Stephen A. Gaeta, Leonard Ilkhanoff, Brett D. Atwater, James Duc et al.
Journal of the American Heart Association
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Rectilinear Biphasic Waveform and Biphasic Truncated Exponential Waveform Shocks for Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation

Stephen A. Gaeta, Leonard Ilkhanoff, Brett D. Atwater, James Duc, Mutaz Alkalbani, Abbas Emaminia, Marc Wish, Adam S. Fein, Eunice Yang, Zachary Hollis, Joseph C. Lee, Robert L. McSwain, Vineet Kumar, Andrew H. Nguyen, Christopher M. O’Connor, Elizabeth Held, Chirag Sandesara, Aysha Arshad, Jeff (Jae) Lee, Haroon Rashid
article en

Abstract

Background No adequately powered prospective studies have compared the safety and efficacy of rectilinear biphasic waveform (RBW) shocks and biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) shocks for direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. The study objective was to compare the efficacy of first shock direct current cardioversion from atrial fibrillation to normal sinus rhythm using a full‐output 200J RBW synchronized shock or a full‐output 360J BTE synchronized shock. Methods This investigator‐initiated, open‐label, unblinded, randomized controlled trial was performed at 3 hospitals in the Inova Health System between July 2023 and July 2024. Adult patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation were randomized 1:1 to full‐output shock using a 200J RBW or 360J BTE shock waveform defibrillator. ECGs were performed before and 1 minute after each shock and adjudicated by a board‐certified electrophysiologist blinded to treatment assignment. Skin pads were positioned in an anterolateral placement in all patients. Successful direct current cardioversion was defined as normal sinus rhythm on 12‐lead ECG obtained ≥1 minute after shock delivery. Results A total of 546 unique patients were eligible for randomization, 270 patients were randomized to a 200J RBW shock and 276 patients to a 360J BTE shock. Normal sinus rhythm ≥1 minute after first shock delivery occurred in 223/270 (82.6%) patients randomized to 200J RBW shock and in 233/276 (84.4%) patients randomized to 360J BTE shock ( P =0.565). Overall, there were no significant differences in the frequency of attaining normal sinus rhythm after multiple direct current cardioversion shocks or safety events between patients randomized to 200J RBW or 360J BTE shocks. Conclusions We observed no difference in safety or efficacy between full‐output RBW or BTE shocks for atrial fibrillation cardioversion. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT05992623.

Journal of the American Heart Association
Heart Foundation (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.