Type 2 diabetes subtypes for precision medicine: methodological challenges and alternative prediction-based approaches

Growing interest in precision diagnostics has stimulated efforts to classify type 2 diabetes into more granular subtypes. Recent research has focused on four pathophysiology-based subtypes: severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD); severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD); moderate obesity-related diabetes (MOD); and moderate age-related diabetes (MARD). While these subtypes provide an attractive framework for precision medicine, they also come with methodological challenges. This narrative review highlights three key issues: (1) uncertainty about the existence of four discrete subtypes; (2) low certainty in subtype assignment; and (3) limited evidence for prognostic and therapeutic value compared with other approaches. As an alternative to subtyping, we discuss individualised prediction models, which provide personalised treatment recommendations based on routine clinical features. These models avoid some of the limitations of discrete subtyping but they do not provide insights into a person's underlying pathophysiology. Thus, these two approaches can be viewed as complementary, each serving a different purpose in precision medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetologia
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-026-06802-6
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Type 2 diabetes subtypes for precision medicine: methodological challenges and alternative prediction-based approaches

John Dennis, Tim Mori, Pedro Cardoso, Oliver Kuß et al.
Diabetologia
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Type 2 diabetes subtypes for precision medicine: methodological challenges and alternative prediction-based approaches

John Dennis, Tim Mori, Pedro Cardoso, Oliver Kuß, Christian Herder
article en

Abstract

Growing interest in precision diagnostics has stimulated efforts to classify type 2 diabetes into more granular subtypes. Recent research has focused on four pathophysiology-based subtypes: severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD); severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD); moderate obesity-related diabetes (MOD); and moderate age-related diabetes (MARD). While these subtypes provide an attractive framework for precision medicine, they also come with methodological challenges. This narrative review highlights three key issues: (1) uncertainty about the existence of four discrete subtypes; (2) low certainty in subtype assignment; and (3) limited evidence for prognostic and therapeutic value compared with other approaches. As an alternative to subtyping, we discuss individualised prediction models, which provide personalised treatment recommendations based on routine clinical features. These models avoid some of the limitations of discrete subtyping but they do not provide insights into a person's underlying pathophysiology. Thus, these two approaches can be viewed as complementary, each serving a different purpose in precision medicine.

Diabetologia
University of Exeter (GB), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility (GB), Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. (DE), German Center for Diabetes Research (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Wellcome Trust, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Bundesministerium für Gesundheit, European Association for the Study of Diabetes, Ministerium für Kultur und Wissenschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen, NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility, BERLIN-CHEMIE, HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.