Multinational survey of pediatric dentists’ knowledge and clinical practices in dentomaxillofacial imaging

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate pediatric dentists' knowledge and clinical practices regarding dentomaxillofacial imaging, with particular emphasis on guideline-consistent indication selection, radiation protection, and dose optimization principles, in accordance with established international guidelines (EAPD, AAPD, and DIMITRA). METHODS: A structured cross-sectional questionnaire was distributed to pediatric dentists from eight countries (Egypt, Jordan, Mexico, Pakistan, Poland, Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, and the USA) through a convenience and snowball sampling approach. The survey assessed knowledge of radiation protection, radiographic parameters, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) indications and resolution selection, and routine clinical practices. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 488 pediatric dentists participated, with a mean knowledge score of 39.9 ± 4.7, and 75.8% demonstrated moderate knowledge. Awareness of dose-reduction strategies was limited, as 41.6% identified rectangular collimation as the most effective radiation protection measure and 17.7% recognized its impact on radiation dose. Knowledge of dose-optimization principles varied: 68.0% of respondents demonstrated knowledge of the ALARA/ALADA principle, whereas 46.5% demonstrated knowledge of the ALADAIP concept. Clinical practices showed patterns that were partially consistent with guideline recommendations. Regarding CBCT, 57.4% had not received formal training, 43.6% were uncertain about appropriate field-of-view selection, and 91.0% reported fewer than five scans per month. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric dentists demonstrated moderate radiation knowledge but inconsistent application of radiation protection principles. These findings indicate a gap between theoretical knowledge and clinical practice. Targeted, practice-oriented education is needed to improve dose optimization and CBCT-related decision-making. Findings should be interpreted with caution due to the non-probability sampling design. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This multinational study highlights persistent gaps in pediatric dental imaging practices and supports the need for standardized, competency-based training to improve radiation safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twag052
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multinational survey of pediatric dentists’ knowledge and clinical practices in dentomaxillofacial imaging

Angelika Kobylińska, Gamze Coşan Ata, Canan Duman, Berkant Sezer et al.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Multinational survey of pediatric dentists’ knowledge and clinical practices in dentomaxillofacial imaging

Angelika Kobylińska, Gamze Coşan Ata, Canan Duman, Berkant Sezer, Ola Barakat Al-Batayneh, Sajjad Ahmad, Álvaro García Pérez, Heba Sabbagh, Marwa Baraka, Majd Alsaleh, Hakan Eren, Yousef Khader
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate pediatric dentists' knowledge and clinical practices regarding dentomaxillofacial imaging, with particular emphasis on guideline-consistent indication selection, radiation protection, and dose optimization principles, in accordance with established international guidelines (EAPD, AAPD, and DIMITRA). METHODS: A structured cross-sectional questionnaire was distributed to pediatric dentists from eight countries (Egypt, Jordan, Mexico, Pakistan, Poland, Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, and the USA) through a convenience and snowball sampling approach. The survey assessed knowledge of radiation protection, radiographic parameters, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) indications and resolution selection, and routine clinical practices. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 488 pediatric dentists participated, with a mean knowledge score of 39.9 ± 4.7, and 75.8% demonstrated moderate knowledge. Awareness of dose-reduction strategies was limited, as 41.6% identified rectangular collimation as the most effective radiation protection measure and 17.7% recognized its impact on radiation dose. Knowledge of dose-optimization principles varied: 68.0% of respondents demonstrated knowledge of the ALARA/ALADA principle, whereas 46.5% demonstrated knowledge of the ALADAIP concept. Clinical practices showed patterns that were partially consistent with guideline recommendations. Regarding CBCT, 57.4% had not received formal training, 43.6% were uncertain about appropriate field-of-view selection, and 91.0% reported fewer than five scans per month. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric dentists demonstrated moderate radiation knowledge but inconsistent application of radiation protection principles. These findings indicate a gap between theoretical knowledge and clinical practice. Targeted, practice-oriented education is needed to improve dose optimization and CBCT-related decision-making. Findings should be interpreted with caution due to the non-probability sampling design. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This multinational study highlights persistent gaps in pediatric dental imaging practices and supports the need for standardized, competency-based training to improve radiation safety.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi (TR), Khyber Medical College (PK), Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), Illinois College (US), King Abdulaziz University (SA), Medical University of Warsaw (PL), University of Sharjah (AE), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Department of Public Health (AS), Muğla University (TR), Alexandria University (EG), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.