Self-Reported LLM Usage And Outcomes On A Data Science Project: Evidence From Two Undergraduate Courses

To help understand the effect of Large Language Models (LLMs) on data science practice we examine the extent to which self-reported LLM usage is correlated with the mark that a student received on a final paper in a classroom data science setting. We find some mild evidence from this observational study that LLM usage may be associated with better scores, especially for students who do not natively speak English. Additionally, comparing self-reported usage, there was a considerable increase between the class that occurred in January-April 2024 where 41 per cent of students self-reported extensive LLM usage and the class that occurred in September-December 2024 where 69 per cent reported extensive LLM usage. Despite the classroom setting used for evaluation, the task of interest is similar to the work done by professional data scientists. Our finding suggests the need for more extensive work evaluating how LLMs can be integrated into the data science workflow in a way that provides value in both the classroom and the workplace.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2026.2708860
Primary Topic
Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-Reported LLM Usage And Outcomes On A Data Science Project: Evidence From Two Undergraduate Courses

Rohan Alexander, Luca Carnegie, Nathalie Moon
Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education
Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
article

Self-Reported LLM Usage And Outcomes On A Data Science Project: Evidence From Two Undergraduate Courses

Rohan Alexander, Luca Carnegie, Nathalie Moon
article en

Abstract

To help understand the effect of Large Language Models (LLMs) on data science practice we examine the extent to which self-reported LLM usage is correlated with the mark that a student received on a final paper in a classroom data science setting. We find some mild evidence from this observational study that LLM usage may be associated with better scores, especially for students who do not natively speak English. Additionally, comparing self-reported usage, there was a considerable increase between the class that occurred in January-April 2024 where 41 per cent of students self-reported extensive LLM usage and the class that occurred in September-December 2024 where 69 per cent reported extensive LLM usage. Despite the classroom setting used for evaluation, the task of interest is similar to the work done by professional data scientists. Our finding suggests the need for more extensive work evaluating how LLMs can be integrated into the data science workflow in a way that provides value in both the classroom and the workplace.

Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education
University of Toronto (CA), Statistical Service (CY), Statistical Research (United States) (US)
University of Toronto
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.