The development and initial validation of the Perinatal Intrusions Interpretation Index: A novel scale that measures negative appraisals of infant‐related intrusive thoughts

OBJECTIVES: Unwanted and often distressing intrusive thoughts of infant-related harm are common during the perinatal period and are associated with poorer maternal mental health. The mechanisms linking perinatal intrusive thoughts to mental health remain poorly understood. One proposed avenue is through maladaptive appraisals, yet there currently are no measures capturing perinatal-specific appraisals. The aim of the current study was to develop and validate a novel Perinatal Intrusions Interpretation Index (PIII) to assess negative appraisals related to intrusions of infant-related harm. METHODS: 439 people who were 1-6 months postpartum completed 12 items capturing appraisals of perinatal intrusions and an adapted online version of the Postpartum Intrusions Interview. A second validation sample, N = 142 people ≤ 9 months postpartum, completed the final 10-item PIII. RESULTS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated a three-factor structure of the PIII: (1) inflated responsibility, (2) importance of thoughts and (3) need for control. The total PIII and subscales demonstrated good internal consistency. Higher negative appraisals on the PIII were significantly associated with more frequent and distressing intrusive thoughts of accidental and intentional infant-related harm and more maladaptive behavioural responses to perinatal intrusions. Intrusion type (accidental vs intentional) moderated the relationship between negative appraisals and intrusion frequency and distress and frequency of behavioural responses. CONCLUSIONS: The PIII is a reliable and valid scale to assess negative appraisals of infant-related harm intrusions. Negative appraisals may be a cognitive risk factor for perinatal intrusions to progress from normative to functionally impairing, offering a modifiable target for the prevention and treatment of perinatal anxiety disorders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.70093
Primary Topic
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The development and initial validation of the Perinatal Intrusions Interpretation Index: A novel scale that measures negative appraisals of infant‐related intrusive thoughts

Michelle Leanne Moulds, Susanne Schweizer, Nathan M. Holmes, Richard Allan Bryant et al.
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
article

The development and initial validation of the Perinatal Intrusions Interpretation Index: A novel scale that measures negative appraisals of infant‐related intrusive thoughts

Michelle Leanne Moulds, Susanne Schweizer, Nathan M. Holmes, Richard Allan Bryant, Nichole Fairbrother, Hana McMahon, Sarah Daniels, Jodie E. Pestana, Yasmin Hasan, N. Reilly, Bronwyn Graham, Florencia Canessa, Ariane Beeston, Dua Kashany, Nita-Roya Roschanzamir, Yan Lin, Lucy Zhang, Prabha S Chandra, Jolene Leong, Emily Morgan, Kirsten Hertog
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Unwanted and often distressing intrusive thoughts of infant-related harm are common during the perinatal period and are associated with poorer maternal mental health. The mechanisms linking perinatal intrusive thoughts to mental health remain poorly understood. One proposed avenue is through maladaptive appraisals, yet there currently are no measures capturing perinatal-specific appraisals. The aim of the current study was to develop and validate a novel Perinatal Intrusions Interpretation Index (PIII) to assess negative appraisals related to intrusions of infant-related harm. METHODS: 439 people who were 1-6 months postpartum completed 12 items capturing appraisals of perinatal intrusions and an adapted online version of the Postpartum Intrusions Interview. A second validation sample, N = 142 people ≤ 9 months postpartum, completed the final 10-item PIII. RESULTS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated a three-factor structure of the PIII: (1) inflated responsibility, (2) importance of thoughts and (3) need for control. The total PIII and subscales demonstrated good internal consistency. Higher negative appraisals on the PIII were significantly associated with more frequent and distressing intrusive thoughts of accidental and intentional infant-related harm and more maladaptive behavioural responses to perinatal intrusions. Intrusion type (accidental vs intentional) moderated the relationship between negative appraisals and intrusion frequency and distress and frequency of behavioural responses. CONCLUSIONS: The PIII is a reliable and valid scale to assess negative appraisals of infant-related harm intrusions. Negative appraisals may be a cognitive risk factor for perinatal intrusions to progress from normative to functionally impairing, offering a modifiable target for the prevention and treatment of perinatal anxiety disorders.

British Journal of Clinical Psychology
University of British Columbia (CA), MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB), University of Wollongong (AU), University of Cambridge (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU), The George Institute for Global Health (AU), Perinatal Institute (GB), National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.