Leveraging current capacity to address the high prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis in South Africa: Modelling potential costs and benefits of near point-of-care GeneXpert testing for STIs

South Africa has high sexually transmitted infections (STIs) prevalence and currently implements syndromic management, which has limitations including untreated asymptomatic infections and excess antibiotic use. Diagnostic tools like GeneXpert may offer potential improvements. We evaluated potential costs and benefits of GeneXpert for STIs testing. We developed a static analytical model using existing data over a one-year time horizon (January-December 2024) from a provider perspective. We estimated costs (2024 USD), outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of syndromic management and multiple near point-of-care (i.e., off-site laboratory) GeneXpert testing scenarios for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Trichomonas vaginalis. Target groups included symptomatic individuals, antenatal care (ANC) attendees, and HIV testers. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted on key parameters. Cost per person, and per person correctly diagnosed and treated ranged from $21-$29 under syndromic management and $88-$755 in GeneXpert scenarios. Syndromic management cost the healthcare system an estimated $24.1 million per year; symptomatic GeneXpert testing would cost substantially more: $102.1-$207.8 million, and $300.9 million-$2.1 billion for GeneXpert scenarios involving symptomatic individuals, ANC attendees, and HIV testers. GeneXpert testing reduces excess antibiotic use by up to 88% compared to syndromic management. Of scenarios modelled, three were on the cost-effectiveness frontier: syndromic management, S4: symptomatic adults and adolescent girls and young women HIV testers, and S8: symptomatic adults, ANC attendees and HIV testers. While syndromic management was least costly, incremental cost per additional person correctly diagnosed and treated was $863 (S4) and $1,064 (S8). These scenarios would cost $3.5 and $12.0 billion over 5-years, respectively, compared to $146.0 million in syndromic management. Staff and diagnostic cost were the most influential parameter in sensitivity analysis. Prioritizing GeneXpert testing for symptomatic individuals and high-risk groups (e.g., HIV testers) can improve STI management but requires additional investment. These findings support the need for targeted strategies to optimise STI control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004480
Primary Topic
Reproductive tract infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging current capacity to address the high prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis in South Africa: Modelling potential costs and benefits of near point-of-care GeneXpert testing for STIs

Katherine Snyman, Lise Jamieson, Nkgomeleng Lekodeba, Brooke E Nichols
PLOS Global Public Health
Reproductive tract infections research
article

Leveraging current capacity to address the high prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis in South Africa: Modelling potential costs and benefits of near point-of-care GeneXpert testing for STIs

Katherine Snyman, Lise Jamieson, Nkgomeleng Lekodeba, Brooke E Nichols
article en

Abstract

South Africa has high sexually transmitted infections (STIs) prevalence and currently implements syndromic management, which has limitations including untreated asymptomatic infections and excess antibiotic use. Diagnostic tools like GeneXpert may offer potential improvements. We evaluated potential costs and benefits of GeneXpert for STIs testing. We developed a static analytical model using existing data over a one-year time horizon (January-December 2024) from a provider perspective. We estimated costs (2024 USD), outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of syndromic management and multiple near point-of-care (i.e., off-site laboratory) GeneXpert testing scenarios for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Trichomonas vaginalis. Target groups included symptomatic individuals, antenatal care (ANC) attendees, and HIV testers. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted on key parameters. Cost per person, and per person correctly diagnosed and treated ranged from $21-$29 under syndromic management and $88-$755 in GeneXpert scenarios. Syndromic management cost the healthcare system an estimated $24.1 million per year; symptomatic GeneXpert testing would cost substantially more: $102.1-$207.8 million, and $300.9 million-$2.1 billion for GeneXpert scenarios involving symptomatic individuals, ANC attendees, and HIV testers. GeneXpert testing reduces excess antibiotic use by up to 88% compared to syndromic management. Of scenarios modelled, three were on the cost-effectiveness frontier: syndromic management, S4: symptomatic adults and adolescent girls and young women HIV testers, and S8: symptomatic adults, ANC attendees and HIV testers. While syndromic management was least costly, incremental cost per additional person correctly diagnosed and treated was $863 (S4) and $1,064 (S8). These scenarios would cost $3.5 and $12.0 billion over 5-years, respectively, compared to $146.0 million in syndromic management. Staff and diagnostic cost were the most influential parameter in sensitivity analysis. Prioritizing GeneXpert testing for symptomatic individuals and high-risk groups (e.g., HIV testers) can improve STI management but requires additional investment. These findings support the need for targeted strategies to optimise STI control.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(7)
Boston University (US), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), National Research Foundation (ZA), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Reproductive tract infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.