Scanning for representation: A scoping review of racial and ethnic diversity in <scp>MRI</scp> studies of the maternal brain

Abstract A growing number of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies are examining brain changes across pregnancy and early motherhood, gaining fundamental insight into the neural adaptations of motherhood, with critical clinical and policy implications for supporting mother, child, and family unit. As the field takes off, now is the time to take stock of the current literature and neuroscience practices, to ensure that the field is based on studies that are robust, representative, and transparent. Here, we conducted a scoping review to understand the racial and ethnic diversity of participants reported in MRI studies of the maternal brain, guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Our findings highlight three key issues in the 203 identified studies of the maternal brain using MRI: (1) the widespread underreporting of participant racial and ethnic data, with only 38.92% of studies reporting race and/or ethnicity demographics; (2) the overrepresentation of white participants, with 48.23% of the samples that report race and/or ethnicity identifying as white/Caucasian; and (3) the disproportionate geographical locations of studies, with 69.95% of studies from North America or Europe and Central Asia. These findings raise concerns about the generalizability of existing research beyond WEIRD (western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic) populations, and underscore the urgent need for concerted structural change in neuroscience research practices. While identifying a lack of diversity is only the first step, this scoping review serves as a call to action for greater representation in future research, for our own research group as well as others.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuroendocrinology
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.70232
Primary Topic
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scanning for representation: A scoping review of racial and ethnic diversity in MRI studies of the maternal brain

Jocelyn A. Ricard, Edwina R. Orchard, M. Day, Clíona L. Kelly et al.
Journal of Neuroendocrinology
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
article

Scanning for representation: A scoping review of racial and ethnic diversity in MRI studies of the maternal brain

Jocelyn A. Ricard, Edwina R. Orchard, M. Day, Clíona L. Kelly, Tal Yatziv, Kathleen Guan, Kathy Ayala, Termara Parker, Kathryn M. Wall, Melissa Funaro, Francesca Penner, Josephine Levy, Victoria Hart-Derrick, Helena J. V. Rutherford, Jin Young Shin, Claudia G. Gaebler, Amorine Adodo
article en

Abstract

Abstract A growing number of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies are examining brain changes across pregnancy and early motherhood, gaining fundamental insight into the neural adaptations of motherhood, with critical clinical and policy implications for supporting mother, child, and family unit. As the field takes off, now is the time to take stock of the current literature and neuroscience practices, to ensure that the field is based on studies that are robust, representative, and transparent. Here, we conducted a scoping review to understand the racial and ethnic diversity of participants reported in MRI studies of the maternal brain, guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Our findings highlight three key issues in the 203 identified studies of the maternal brain using MRI: (1) the widespread underreporting of participant racial and ethnic data, with only 38.92% of studies reporting race and/or ethnicity demographics; (2) the overrepresentation of white participants, with 48.23% of the samples that report race and/or ethnicity identifying as white/Caucasian; and (3) the disproportionate geographical locations of studies, with 69.95% of studies from North America or Europe and Central Asia. These findings raise concerns about the generalizability of existing research beyond WEIRD (western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic) populations, and underscore the urgent need for concerted structural change in neuroscience research practices. While identifying a lack of diversity is only the first step, this scoping review serves as a call to action for greater representation in future research, for our own research group as well as others.

Journal of NeuroendocrinologyVol. 38(8)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Howard University (US), University of Connecticut (US), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Yale University (US), Stanford Medicine (US), McGill University (CA), Columbia University (US), Stanford University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.