The Linear Relationship Between Visual Imagery and Alexithymia Breaks When Imagery Is Absent: Complete Aphantasics Are No More Alexithymic Than Typical Imagers

Several studies have suggested a link between aphantasia (reduced or absent visual mental imagery) and alexithymia (difficulty identifying and describing one's feelings, together with an externally oriented thinking style), but results and interpretations differ across studies, and no consensus has emerged. We pooled data from five independent studies (N = 1478: 147 complete aphantasics, 141 hypophantasics, 1115 typical imagers, 75 hyperphantasics) who completed the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire and the twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale, and compared six candidate models, from linear and categorical baselines to several non-linear alternatives (GAM, Segmented and Floor-group models), to determine the shape of the relationship between visual imagery vividness and alexithymia, rather than assuming it in advance. The best fitting and most interpretable model (floor-group) showed that among all participants capable of some degree of visual imagery (from hypo- to hyperphantasics), alexithymia declined as visual imagery vividness increased, consistent across all three TAS-20 sub-scales. Complete aphantasics broke this linear relationship entirely: rather than showing the highest level of alexithymia, as the linear relationship would predict, their scores were lower than that of hypophantasics and did not meaningfully differ from those of typical imagers. This discontinuity, specific to the total absence of visual imagery, was corroborated by an equally well-fitting segmented model, held up across all five studies individually, and is inconsistent with prior work treating any degree of reduced imagery as equivalent. Our results support the idea that some components of alexithymia are related to the level of visual imagery vividness in people that experience visual imagery. However, in people with complete aphantasia, alexithymia levels may depend on other processes. In other words, having no visual imagery at all does not seem to be associated with increased alexithymia levels, while having very weak visual imagery does.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peer Community Journal
Published
2026-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24072/pcjournal.772
Primary Topic
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Linear Relationship Between Visual Imagery and Alexithymia Breaks When Imagery Is Absent: Complete Aphantasics Are No More Alexithymic Than Typical Imagers

Maël Delem, Marine Mas, Olivier Luminet, Perrine RUBY et al.
Peer Community Journal
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
article

The Linear Relationship Between Visual Imagery and Alexithymia Breaks When Imagery Is Absent: Complete Aphantasics Are No More Alexithymic Than Typical Imagers

Maël Delem, Marine Mas, Olivier Luminet, Perrine RUBY, Gaën Plancher
article en

Abstract

Several studies have suggested a link between aphantasia (reduced or absent visual mental imagery) and alexithymia (difficulty identifying and describing one's feelings, together with an externally oriented thinking style), but results and interpretations differ across studies, and no consensus has emerged. We pooled data from five independent studies (N = 1478: 147 complete aphantasics, 141 hypophantasics, 1115 typical imagers, 75 hyperphantasics) who completed the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire and the twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale, and compared six candidate models, from linear and categorical baselines to several non-linear alternatives (GAM, Segmented and Floor-group models), to determine the shape of the relationship between visual imagery vividness and alexithymia, rather than assuming it in advance. The best fitting and most interpretable model (floor-group) showed that among all participants capable of some degree of visual imagery (from hypo- to hyperphantasics), alexithymia declined as visual imagery vividness increased, consistent across all three TAS-20 sub-scales. Complete aphantasics broke this linear relationship entirely: rather than showing the highest level of alexithymia, as the linear relationship would predict, their scores were lower than that of hypophantasics and did not meaningfully differ from those of typical imagers. This discontinuity, specific to the total absence of visual imagery, was corroborated by an equally well-fitting segmented model, held up across all five studies individually, and is inconsistent with prior work treating any degree of reduced imagery as equivalent. Our results support the idea that some components of alexithymia are related to the level of visual imagery vividness in people that experience visual imagery. However, in people with complete aphantasia, alexithymia levels may depend on other processes. In other words, having no visual imagery at all does not seem to be associated with increased alexithymia levels, while having very weak visual imagery does.

Peer Community JournalVol. 6
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Fund for Scientific Research (BE), Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Université Lumière Lyon 2 (FR), Laboratoire d’Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs (FR), Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (FR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.