Two‐phase ammonia plume behavior in a still room: Jack Rabbit <scp>III</scp> chamber studies

Abstract This paper describes a new set of 45 laboratory experiments where about 180 g of ammonia was released from pressurized liquefied storage in a still 51.3 m 3 chamber (i.e., a small room) and the variations of the ammonia gas concentrations and liquid deposition over a 60 min time period were investigated. Chamber temperatures ranged from −18 to 40°C, and relative humidities from 11% to 90%. A liquid collection (catch) tray was placed so that the 45° downwards‐directed two‐phase jet would strike its center, and a scale under the tray measured the liquid mass. In three trials, the tray was inverted; in six trials, a water spray system was operated; and, in four trials, CO 2 gas was introduced. The initial ammonia deposition to the tray ranged from about 10%–50% of the released mass, with the larger fractions occurring during colder conditions. The strong ammonia jet generated eddies lasting for many minutes. The addition of CO 2 gas produced only minor differences in the concentrations. The addition of water spray resulted in about a 50% reduction in ammonia vapor. These results should be helpful in planning emergency response to ammonia accidents in confined locations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Process Safety Progress
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.70050
Primary Topic
Fire dynamics and safety research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two‐phase ammonia plume behavior in a still room: Jack Rabbit III chamber studies

Steven R. Hanna, Sun McMasters, Ronald Meris
Process Safety Progress
Fire dynamics and safety research
article

Two‐phase ammonia plume behavior in a still room: Jack Rabbit III chamber studies

Steven R. Hanna, Sun McMasters, Ronald Meris
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper describes a new set of 45 laboratory experiments where about 180 g of ammonia was released from pressurized liquefied storage in a still 51.3 m 3 chamber (i.e., a small room) and the variations of the ammonia gas concentrations and liquid deposition over a 60 min time period were investigated. Chamber temperatures ranged from −18 to 40°C, and relative humidities from 11% to 90%. A liquid collection (catch) tray was placed so that the 45° downwards‐directed two‐phase jet would strike its center, and a scale under the tray measured the liquid mass. In three trials, the tray was inverted; in six trials, a water spray system was operated; and, in four trials, CO 2 gas was introduced. The initial ammonia deposition to the tray ranged from about 10%–50% of the released mass, with the larger fractions occurring during colder conditions. The strong ammonia jet generated eddies lasting for many minutes. The addition of CO 2 gas produced only minor differences in the concentrations. The addition of water spray resulted in about a 50% reduction in ammonia vapor. These results should be helpful in planning emergency response to ammonia accidents in confined locations.

Process Safety Progress
United States Department of Homeland Security (US), Defense Threat Reduction Agency (US), CECOM Software Engineering Center (US)
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Transport Canada, Defense Threat Reduction Agency
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Fire dynamics and safety research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Two‐phase ammonia plume behavior in a still room: Jack Rabbit <scp>III</scp> chamber studies — Steven R. Hanna, Sun McMasters, et al. · Process Safety Progress (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS