The Reality of Active Targeting in Nanomedicine: Promise Versus Performance

Active targeting in nanomedicine aims to enhance therapeutic efficacy by functionalising nanocarriers with ligands that selectively bind biological targets. Despite extensive research, clinical translation has remained limited, with most approved systems relying on antibodies or passive delivery mechanisms rather than complex targeted nanoparticles. This perspective critically examines the gap between the conceptual promise of active targeting and its practical performance. Drawing comparisons with biological systems, we highlight that natural targeting relies on dynamic, multi-step and energy-dependent processes rather than simple ligand-receptor interactions. Current nanomedicine approaches are constrained by an oversimplified view of targeting, neglecting key factors such as multivalency, spatial organisation, kinetics and biological barriers. Future progress requires a shift towards systems-level design, integrating spatiotemporal control, adaptive materials and computational modelling. Ultimately, we propose a design-by-architecture paradigm, in which targeting is encoded into nanomaterial structure, enabling programmable and biologically guided delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemBioChem
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.70475
Primary Topic
Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Reality of Active Targeting in Nanomedicine: Promise Versus Performance

Francesco Cellesi
ChemBioChem
Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
article

The Reality of Active Targeting in Nanomedicine: Promise Versus Performance

Francesco Cellesi
article en

Abstract

Active targeting in nanomedicine aims to enhance therapeutic efficacy by functionalising nanocarriers with ligands that selectively bind biological targets. Despite extensive research, clinical translation has remained limited, with most approved systems relying on antibodies or passive delivery mechanisms rather than complex targeted nanoparticles. This perspective critically examines the gap between the conceptual promise of active targeting and its practical performance. Drawing comparisons with biological systems, we highlight that natural targeting relies on dynamic, multi-step and energy-dependent processes rather than simple ligand-receptor interactions. Current nanomedicine approaches are constrained by an oversimplified view of targeting, neglecting key factors such as multivalency, spatial organisation, kinetics and biological barriers. Future progress requires a shift towards systems-level design, integrating spatiotemporal control, adaptive materials and computational modelling. Ultimately, we propose a design-by-architecture paradigm, in which targeting is encoded into nanomaterial structure, enabling programmable and biologically guided delivery.

ChemBioChemVol. 27(14)
Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.