Area treated and waterhemp control in soybean with ONE SMART SPRAY™ technology

Abstract Emerging targeted herbicide application technologies, such as the ONE SMART SPRAY™ system (Bosch BASF Smart Farming, Cologne, Germany), enable postemergence herbicide application only where weeds are detected. Field studies were conducted at four site-years in Seymour, IL, and Janesville, WI, during 2023 and 2024 to compare area treated and waterhemp control between broadcast and targeted herbicide applications in soybean. In Seymour – 2023, early postemergence application (V2 growth stage) resulted in less area treated (26%) than the standard time but required inclusion of a layered residual herbicide to reach 89 to 93% waterhemp control and biomass reduction ≥94% at 28 days after standard application time (DASAT). The standard time (V4 growth stage) in Seymour – 2023 provided 87 to 97% waterhemp control and ≥94% biomass reduction at 28 DASAT but resulted in more area treated 76% at postemergence application. In Seymour – 2024A and Seymour – 2024B, where waterhemp densities were low (≤5 plants m -2 ), treatments had >96% waterhemp control and biomass reduction 28 DASAT, and targeted applications resulted in 17 to 34% area treated, regardless of application time. In contrast, in Janesville – 2024 (high waterhemp density; > 30 plant m -2 ), waterhemp control and biomass reduction did not exceed 90% at 28 DASAT, where area treated was ≥97% at postemergence application, indicating that targeted spraying essentially functioned as a broadcast application and would have required additional postemergence application(s) for effective season-long control. Under high waterhemp densities, frequent nozzle activation reduced potential herbicide savings and diminished differences from broadcast applications, clearly indicating that targeted systems are best suited for fields where effective foundational management practices, including robust preemergence herbicide programs and other integrated weed management tactics, reduce weed density during postemergence application season.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Weed Technology
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2026.10140
Primary Topic
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Area treated and waterhemp control in soybean with ONE SMART SPRAY™ technology

Isaac Barnhart, Christopher A. Proctor, Greg R. Kruger, J. Anita Dille et al.
Weed Technology
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
article

Area treated and waterhemp control in soybean with ONE SMART SPRAY™ technology

Isaac Barnhart, Christopher A. Proctor, Greg R. Kruger, J. Anita Dille, Ahmadreza Mobli, Zaim Ugljic, Rodrigo Werle, Ryan P. DeWerff, Kalvin Miller
article en

Abstract

Abstract Emerging targeted herbicide application technologies, such as the ONE SMART SPRAY™ system (Bosch BASF Smart Farming, Cologne, Germany), enable postemergence herbicide application only where weeds are detected. Field studies were conducted at four site-years in Seymour, IL, and Janesville, WI, during 2023 and 2024 to compare area treated and waterhemp control between broadcast and targeted herbicide applications in soybean. In Seymour – 2023, early postemergence application (V2 growth stage) resulted in less area treated (26%) than the standard time but required inclusion of a layered residual herbicide to reach 89 to 93% waterhemp control and biomass reduction ≥94% at 28 days after standard application time (DASAT). The standard time (V4 growth stage) in Seymour – 2023 provided 87 to 97% waterhemp control and ≥94% biomass reduction at 28 DASAT but resulted in more area treated 76% at postemergence application. In Seymour – 2024A and Seymour – 2024B, where waterhemp densities were low (≤5 plants m -2 ), treatments had >96% waterhemp control and biomass reduction 28 DASAT, and targeted applications resulted in 17 to 34% area treated, regardless of application time. In contrast, in Janesville – 2024 (high waterhemp density; > 30 plant m -2 ), waterhemp control and biomass reduction did not exceed 90% at 28 DASAT, where area treated was ≥97% at postemergence application, indicating that targeted spraying essentially functioned as a broadcast application and would have required additional postemergence application(s) for effective season-long control. Under high waterhemp densities, frequent nozzle activation reduced potential herbicide savings and diminished differences from broadcast applications, clearly indicating that targeted systems are best suited for fields where effective foundational management practices, including robust preemergence herbicide programs and other integrated weed management tactics, reduce weed density during postemergence application season.

Weed Technology
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Kansas State University (US), BASF (United States) (US), Xerox (France) (FR), V.F. Corporation (United States)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.