Estimating Individual Leaf Area of Dendrocalamus brandisii: Allometric vs. Regression vs. Machine Learning

Accurate estimation of individual (culm-level) leaf area (LA) is essential to quantifying canopy structure, productivity, and carbon dynamics in bamboo plantations, yet it is often constrained by limited field data and high measurement costs. Using destructive sampling data from 52 Dendrocalamus brandisii culms in Sanya, China, we evaluated allometric models, regression approaches, and machine learning algorithms for estimating individual LA. Candidate models were built from diameter at breast height (DBH), culm height (H), and their combinations and were assessed via five-fold cross-validation, bootstrap uncertainty analysis, and the small-sample corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc). DBH was the dominant predictor of LA (r = 0.826), whereas adding H yielded no improvement due to strong collinearity (r = 0.922). The simple DBH-based power-law model (LA=a·DBHb, b ≈ 1.8) achieved the best balance between accuracy and parsimony, explaining ~61% of the cross-validated variance with stable bootstrap parameters. Although Random Forest showed high in-sample fit (R2 = 0.942), its cross-validated performance was low (R2 = 0.496), indicating overfitting when using small samples. These results demonstrate that DBH-based allometric models provide a robust, interpretable, and cost-effective tool for large-scale biomass and carbon stock assessment in D. brandisii plantations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f17080863
Primary Topic
Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating Individual Leaf Area of Dendrocalamus brandisii: Allometric vs. Regression vs. Machine Learning

Bin Wu, John L. Innes, Shixin Deng, Renyi Gui
Forests
Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
article

Estimating Individual Leaf Area of Dendrocalamus brandisii: Allometric vs. Regression vs. Machine Learning

Bin Wu, John L. Innes, Shixin Deng, Renyi Gui
article en

Abstract

Accurate estimation of individual (culm-level) leaf area (LA) is essential to quantifying canopy structure, productivity, and carbon dynamics in bamboo plantations, yet it is often constrained by limited field data and high measurement costs. Using destructive sampling data from 52 Dendrocalamus brandisii culms in Sanya, China, we evaluated allometric models, regression approaches, and machine learning algorithms for estimating individual LA. Candidate models were built from diameter at breast height (DBH), culm height (H), and their combinations and were assessed via five-fold cross-validation, bootstrap uncertainty analysis, and the small-sample corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc). DBH was the dominant predictor of LA (r = 0.826), whereas adding H yielded no improvement due to strong collinearity (r = 0.922). The simple DBH-based power-law model (LA=a·DBHb, b ≈ 1.8) achieved the best balance between accuracy and parsimony, explaining ~61% of the cross-validated variance with stable bootstrap parameters. Although Random Forest showed high in-sample fit (R2 = 0.942), its cross-validated performance was low (R2 = 0.496), indicating overfitting when using small samples. These results demonstrate that DBH-based allometric models provide a robust, interpretable, and cost-effective tool for large-scale biomass and carbon stock assessment in D. brandisii plantations.

ForestsVol. 17(8)
Zhejiang A & F University (CN), University of British Columbia (CA), Zhejiang Lab (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.