The strategic human‐capital conversion problem

Abstract Strategic human‐capital (SHC) research has explained why human capital can be strategically valuable. It has been less precise about how organizations convert human capital into value that is realized, legitimate, and appropriable. This paper leverages current discussions in SHC to develop a conversion‐centered agenda around three frontier challenges: artificial intelligence and SHC, causal attribution, and middle management. Across these domains, the same stock of human capital can produce different consequences because organizations differ in how they configure work, relationships, authority, selection, and recognition. Fruitful avenues for future research can focus on the mechanisms that mediate conversion: work design, relational infrastructure, reconfiguration, selection architecture, authority allocation, and visibility and recognition. These mechanisms shape career, legitimacy, distributional, and collective outcomes, including how surplus is divided between firms and employees. The framework grounds SHC in a matching logic while sharpening its account of value creation, value capture, and surplus distribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Management Review
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.70097
Primary Topic
AI and HR Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The strategic human‐capital conversion problem

Russ Coff, Zijing Yuan, Miguel Espinosa
European Management Review
AI and HR Technologies
article

The strategic human‐capital conversion problem

Russ Coff, Zijing Yuan, Miguel Espinosa
article en

Abstract

Abstract Strategic human‐capital (SHC) research has explained why human capital can be strategically valuable. It has been less precise about how organizations convert human capital into value that is realized, legitimate, and appropriable. This paper leverages current discussions in SHC to develop a conversion‐centered agenda around three frontier challenges: artificial intelligence and SHC, causal attribution, and middle management. Across these domains, the same stock of human capital can produce different consequences because organizations differ in how they configure work, relationships, authority, selection, and recognition. Fruitful avenues for future research can focus on the mechanisms that mediate conversion: work design, relational infrastructure, reconfiguration, selection architecture, authority allocation, and visibility and recognition. These mechanisms shape career, legitimacy, distributional, and collective outcomes, including how surplus is divided between firms and employees. The framework grounds SHC in a matching logic while sharpening its account of value creation, value capture, and surplus distribution.

European Management Review
University of Wisconsin System (US), Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Centre Pour La Recherche Economique et ses Applications (FR), Bocconi University (IT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
AI and HR Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The strategic human‐capital conversion problem — Russ Coff, Zijing Yuan, et al. · European Management Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS