Balancing Functionality and Chemical Safety - Preferences for PFAS-free Consumer Products

Abstract The purpose of this study is to examine awareness about and preferences for avoiding PFAS in different consumer products, exemplified by frying pans, outdoor leisure pants and sunscreen. Survey data is collected via a web panel to a representative sample of 2010 individuals living in Sweden. Individual differences in awareness are measured through a short quiz that were answered before the survey questions were introduced, in which respondents were asked to indicate which products that they believe may contain PFAS (in a list of ten different consumer products that all may contain PFAS). Binary logit and mixed logit models are applied to analyse whether respondents reporting that they use these products are willing to pay a higher price for PFAS-free versions. The results indicate that the choice for a PFAS-free product is affected by prior awareness in the case of frying pans and sunscreen. It is further evident that the convenient function of wind- and water resistance is valued highly for outdoor pants. Nevertheless, the relatively high WTPs for avoiding PFAS in all studied consumer products signal to companies whose products contain PFAS to search for alternative and less harmful substances. In other words, our results indicate that it can be profitable to stop using PFAS in manufacturing and clearly signal this to consumers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Consumer Policy
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-026-09629-1
Primary Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing Functionality and Chemical Safety - Preferences for PFAS-free Consumer Products

Linda Wårell, Kristina Ek
Journal of Consumer Policy
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
article

Balancing Functionality and Chemical Safety - Preferences for PFAS-free Consumer Products

Linda Wårell, Kristina Ek
article en

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study is to examine awareness about and preferences for avoiding PFAS in different consumer products, exemplified by frying pans, outdoor leisure pants and sunscreen. Survey data is collected via a web panel to a representative sample of 2010 individuals living in Sweden. Individual differences in awareness are measured through a short quiz that were answered before the survey questions were introduced, in which respondents were asked to indicate which products that they believe may contain PFAS (in a list of ten different consumer products that all may contain PFAS). Binary logit and mixed logit models are applied to analyse whether respondents reporting that they use these products are willing to pay a higher price for PFAS-free versions. The results indicate that the choice for a PFAS-free product is affected by prior awareness in the case of frying pans and sunscreen. It is further evident that the convenient function of wind- and water resistance is valued highly for outdoor pants. Nevertheless, the relatively high WTPs for avoiding PFAS in all studied consumer products signal to companies whose products contain PFAS to search for alternative and less harmful substances. In other words, our results indicate that it can be profitable to stop using PFAS in manufacturing and clearly signal this to consumers.

Journal of Consumer PolicyVol. 49(3)
Luleå University of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.