Lobbying, status quo building and housing policy normalisation in Aotearoa-New Zealand

This article documents and explores the wider housing lobby environment in Aotearoa-New Zealand. It asks how, if at all, professional advocacy has shaped housing policy towards more neoliberal outcomes, thus benefitting corporate and elite vested interests? It focuses on a mix of professional government relations (GR) practitioners, professional associations, large corporations and third sector campaigners involved in the lobbying process. It draws from an interdisciplinary mixed-methods project that combines interviews, content analysis and a series of audits (ministerial diaries, GR personnel). The findings suggest that third sector campaigners have had some success in influencing some policy outcomes, especially when left-leaning governments are in power. However, overall, the third sector has consistent large access and resource deficits and therefore reduced influence. More significantly, the greater influence of the larger corporate advocacy sector is in its facilitation of wide social and professional networks that link parliamentarians, business leaders and others. Such status quo building then operates to normalize neoliberal policy norms and to counter progressive challenges to vested interests in housing policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Housing Studies
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2026.2705246
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lobbying, status quo building and housing policy normalisation in Aotearoa-New Zealand

Aeron Davis
Housing Studies
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

Lobbying, status quo building and housing policy normalisation in Aotearoa-New Zealand

Aeron Davis
article en

Abstract

This article documents and explores the wider housing lobby environment in Aotearoa-New Zealand. It asks how, if at all, professional advocacy has shaped housing policy towards more neoliberal outcomes, thus benefitting corporate and elite vested interests? It focuses on a mix of professional government relations (GR) practitioners, professional associations, large corporations and third sector campaigners involved in the lobbying process. It draws from an interdisciplinary mixed-methods project that combines interviews, content analysis and a series of audits (ministerial diaries, GR personnel). The findings suggest that third sector campaigners have had some success in influencing some policy outcomes, especially when left-leaning governments are in power. However, overall, the third sector has consistent large access and resource deficits and therefore reduced influence. More significantly, the greater influence of the larger corporate advocacy sector is in its facilitation of wide social and professional networks that link parliamentarians, business leaders and others. Such status quo building then operates to normalize neoliberal policy norms and to counter progressive challenges to vested interests in housing policy.

Housing Studies
Victoria University (UG)
Victoria University of Wellington
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.