Lung volumes and their effect on central hemodynamics.

Changes in lung volumes during breathing; at rest, exercise or in disease, alter pulmonary vascular resistance and challenge central hemodynamics. However, it is currently unknown how changes in different lung volumes (i.e. altering end inspiratory lung volume [EILV], end expiratory lung volume [EELV] or tidal volume [Vt]) specifically modify left ventricle (LV) function. Twenty-five healthy individuals (14:11 F:M, 24±4) performed an experimental visit with measures obtained during resting breathing followed by 5 randomized breathing challenges. Each challenge was performed with controlled Vt, breathing frequency, operational lung volumes and duty cycle while 2D echocardiographic imaging of LV end diastolic (LVEDV), end systolic (LVESV) and stroke volume (LVSV) were obtained. Images were also collected for analysis of LV geometry while tissue Doppler imaging and transmitral Doppler were obtained to assess LV myocardial function and filling. Increasing EELV, with Vt at resting levels and EILV reaching critical inspiratory reserve volume ([cIRV] i.e.~90%TLC) decreased LVEDV (107±24 vs. 102±29ml, p < 0.05) and LVSV (66±12 vs. 63±12ml, p<0.05), compared to resting breathing. The changes in central hemodynamics with this breathing pattern were also different from increasing EILV (below cIRV) with an unchanged EELV (p<0.05). Free wall curvature increased from baseline (p=0.03) with the elevated EELV and EILV, while lateral E’ and E/A ratio both decreased (p=0.001, p=0.018, respectively). Central hemodynamics were unchanged from resting breathing when increasing EILV solely through altering Vt (even when EILV reached cIRV), but lateral E’ decreased (p=0.001). During simulated exercise hyperpnea with a mild increase in EELV with EILV reaching cIRV , LVEDV (102±29 vs. 93 ± 26ml), LVESV (42±12 vs. 37±12ml) and SV (66±12 vs. 57±14ml) were reduced (p<0.05, for all) compared to baseline, but not when breathing with a similar pattern with EELV below FRC and EILV below cIRV. Lateral E’ and E/A ratio were reduced in both hyperpnea conditions (p<0.05). Our data demonstrates that increases in EILV and Vt appear to have little effect on central hemodynamics, unless EELV rises above FRC. Increasing EELV, likely reduces LVEDV through both series and direct ventricular interaction associated with external constraint of the LV, altering LV filling and relaxation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Collections
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0453267
Primary Topic
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lung volumes and their effect on central hemodynamics.

JiaWen Lim
Open Collections
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
article

Lung volumes and their effect on central hemodynamics.

JiaWen Lim
article en

Abstract

Changes in lung volumes during breathing; at rest, exercise or in disease, alter pulmonary vascular resistance and challenge central hemodynamics. However, it is currently unknown how changes in different lung volumes (i.e. altering end inspiratory lung volume [EILV], end expiratory lung volume [EELV] or tidal volume [Vt]) specifically modify left ventricle (LV) function. Twenty-five healthy individuals (14:11 F:M, 24±4) performed an experimental visit with measures obtained during resting breathing followed by 5 randomized breathing challenges. Each challenge was performed with controlled Vt, breathing frequency, operational lung volumes and duty cycle while 2D echocardiographic imaging of LV end diastolic (LVEDV), end systolic (LVESV) and stroke volume (LVSV) were obtained. Images were also collected for analysis of LV geometry while tissue Doppler imaging and transmitral Doppler were obtained to assess LV myocardial function and filling. Increasing EELV, with Vt at resting levels and EILV reaching critical inspiratory reserve volume ([cIRV] i.e.~90%TLC) decreased LVEDV (107±24 vs. 102±29ml, p < 0.05) and LVSV (66±12 vs. 63±12ml, p<0.05), compared to resting breathing. The changes in central hemodynamics with this breathing pattern were also different from increasing EILV (below cIRV) with an unchanged EELV (p<0.05). Free wall curvature increased from baseline (p=0.03) with the elevated EELV and EILV, while lateral E’ and E/A ratio both decreased (p=0.001, p=0.018, respectively). Central hemodynamics were unchanged from resting breathing when increasing EILV solely through altering Vt (even when EILV reached cIRV), but lateral E’ decreased (p=0.001). During simulated exercise hyperpnea with a mild increase in EELV with EILV reaching cIRV , LVEDV (102±29 vs. 93 ± 26ml), LVESV (42±12 vs. 37±12ml) and SV (66±12 vs. 57±14ml) were reduced (p<0.05, for all) compared to baseline, but not when breathing with a similar pattern with EELV below FRC and EILV below cIRV. Lateral E’ and E/A ratio were reduced in both hyperpnea conditions (p<0.05). Our data demonstrates that increases in EILV and Vt appear to have little effect on central hemodynamics, unless EELV rises above FRC. Increasing EELV, likely reduces LVEDV through both series and direct ventricular interaction associated with external constraint of the LV, altering LV filling and relaxation.

Open Collections
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.