Bacterial infection in Ebola virus disease, Marburg virus disease, Crimean–Congo hemorrhagic fever, and Lassa fever

Abstract Background Concern for bacterial coinfection in patients with high consequence viral infections (HCVIs) has made the empiric antibiotic administration the standard of care. However, the incidence, microbiology, and clinical significance of bacterial coinfection in HCVIs remain unclear. Methods We conducted a systematic review of case reports, cohort studies, and cross-sectional analyses describing bacterial coinfection in Ebola virus disease (EVD), Marburg virus disease (MVD), Crimean–Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF), and Lassa fever (LF). Data were extracted on study design, setting, diagnostic methods, pathogens, antibiotic use, and outcomes. Results Thirty publications met inclusion criteria. Bacteremia was most commonly reported among patients with CCHF (n = 46), followed by EVD (n = 16), MVD (n = 16), and LF (n = 2). Of 27 EVD patients treated outside Africa, seven (26%) had bacterial coinfection. Across HCVIs, bacteremia was detected a median of 11 days after symptom onset (range 0–23) and was associated with features of sepsis. Pathogens included enteric flora, healthcare-associated organisms, opportunistic pathogens, and zoonotic bacteria—most notably Brucella spp. in CCHF. Ceftriaxone was the most common empiric antibiotic but is predicted to have activity against a minority of bloodstream isolates. Mortality among coinfected patients with EVD or MVD was similar to those without bacterial coinfection, whereas coinfected CCHF patients had higher mortality than those without coinfection (15.5%; 95% CI 8.0–25.9% vs 5.7%; 95% CI 5.1–6.4%). Conclusions Despite being a major concern driving empiric antibiotic use, bacterial coinfection in HCVIs remains poorly described, precluding determination of its incidence or clinical significance. Prospective studies with standardized protocols for bacterial diagnosis and characterization of antimicrobial resistance are needed to guide antimicrobial strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofag404
Primary Topic
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bacterial infection in Ebola virus disease, Marburg virus disease, Crimean–Congo hemorrhagic fever, and Lassa fever

Brady Page, William A. Fischer, David A. Wohl, Elizabeth Moreton
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
article

Bacterial infection in Ebola virus disease, Marburg virus disease, Crimean–Congo hemorrhagic fever, and Lassa fever

Brady Page, William A. Fischer, David A. Wohl, Elizabeth Moreton
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Concern for bacterial coinfection in patients with high consequence viral infections (HCVIs) has made the empiric antibiotic administration the standard of care. However, the incidence, microbiology, and clinical significance of bacterial coinfection in HCVIs remain unclear. Methods We conducted a systematic review of case reports, cohort studies, and cross-sectional analyses describing bacterial coinfection in Ebola virus disease (EVD), Marburg virus disease (MVD), Crimean–Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF), and Lassa fever (LF). Data were extracted on study design, setting, diagnostic methods, pathogens, antibiotic use, and outcomes. Results Thirty publications met inclusion criteria. Bacteremia was most commonly reported among patients with CCHF (n = 46), followed by EVD (n = 16), MVD (n = 16), and LF (n = 2). Of 27 EVD patients treated outside Africa, seven (26%) had bacterial coinfection. Across HCVIs, bacteremia was detected a median of 11 days after symptom onset (range 0–23) and was associated with features of sepsis. Pathogens included enteric flora, healthcare-associated organisms, opportunistic pathogens, and zoonotic bacteria—most notably Brucella spp. in CCHF. Ceftriaxone was the most common empiric antibiotic but is predicted to have activity against a minority of bloodstream isolates. Mortality among coinfected patients with EVD or MVD was similar to those without bacterial coinfection, whereas coinfected CCHF patients had higher mortality than those without coinfection (15.5%; 95% CI 8.0–25.9% vs 5.7%; 95% CI 5.1–6.4%). Conclusions Despite being a major concern driving empiric antibiotic use, bacterial coinfection in HCVIs remains poorly described, precluding determination of its incidence or clinical significance. Prospective studies with standardized protocols for bacterial diagnosis and characterization of antimicrobial resistance are needed to guide antimicrobial strategies.

Open Forum Infectious Diseases
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of California San Diego (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.