Prognostic value of the “modified Osteoporotic Fracture score” for treatment decision in osteoporotic vertebral fractures

The mOF score shows promise as a reliable tool to guide treatment decisions of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs). However, the prognostic value is lacking. This study aims to assess the prognostic value of the mOF score considering clinical and radiological outcomes in accordance with compliant or non-compliant management. A retrospective cohort study included all patients aged ≥50 years and diagnosed with acute thoracolumbar OVF between 2017 and 2021. Final treatment was compared with the recommendations according to the mOF score. Clinical and radiological outcome variables were pairwise compared in each group of treatment recommendation. Final analysis included 482 patients. 81.95% received non-surgical management. Overall, the accuracy rate was 75.1%. The mOF score achieved a sensitivity of 24.7% and a specificity of 86.4% for surgical management prediction (AUC 0.55). In patients with surgical treatment recommendations, compliant management was associated with a significantly lower rate of fracture progression than non-compliant management (11% against 45%, p = 0.019), and lower decline in independent living status (0% compared with 10.6%, p = 0.311). In patients with non-surgical treatment recommendations, non-compliant management was associated with better results in radiological progression ( p < 0.001), pain relief ( p < 0.001), and the need for further therapy due to poor evolution ( p = 0.088). The mOF score demonstrated limited predictive capacity in discriminating the actual received treatment in our cohort. The surgical recommendation was meaningful, identifying better outcomes in patients compliant with the recommendation; for the non-surgical recommendations, vertebral augmentation still may provide a better outcome than conservative bracing and analgesics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-10246-9
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic value of the “modified Osteoporotic Fracture score” for treatment decision in osteoporotic vertebral fractures

Álvaro Zamarrón, Raquel Gutiérrez‐González, Ana Royuela, Victor Bello et al.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Prognostic value of the “modified Osteoporotic Fracture score” for treatment decision in osteoporotic vertebral fractures

Álvaro Zamarrón, Raquel Gutiérrez‐González, Ana Royuela, Victor Bello, Teresa Kalantari García, Mohamed M. Aly
article en

Abstract

The mOF score shows promise as a reliable tool to guide treatment decisions of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs). However, the prognostic value is lacking. This study aims to assess the prognostic value of the mOF score considering clinical and radiological outcomes in accordance with compliant or non-compliant management. A retrospective cohort study included all patients aged ≥50 years and diagnosed with acute thoracolumbar OVF between 2017 and 2021. Final treatment was compared with the recommendations according to the mOF score. Clinical and radiological outcome variables were pairwise compared in each group of treatment recommendation. Final analysis included 482 patients. 81.95% received non-surgical management. Overall, the accuracy rate was 75.1%. The mOF score achieved a sensitivity of 24.7% and a specificity of 86.4% for surgical management prediction (AUC 0.55). In patients with surgical treatment recommendations, compliant management was associated with a significantly lower rate of fracture progression than non-compliant management (11% against 45%, p = 0.019), and lower decline in independent living status (0% compared with 10.6%, p = 0.311). In patients with non-surgical treatment recommendations, non-compliant management was associated with better results in radiological progression ( p < 0.001), pain relief ( p < 0.001), and the need for further therapy due to poor evolution ( p = 0.088). The mOF score demonstrated limited predictive capacity in discriminating the actual received treatment in our cohort. The surgical recommendation was meaningful, identifying better outcomes in patients compliant with the recommendation; for the non-surgical recommendations, vertebral augmentation still may provide a better outcome than conservative bracing and analgesics.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (ES), Prince Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Hospital (SA), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.