A Mixed Review and Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Evaluation of Automated Construction Progress Monitoring (ACPM) Frameworks

The existing automated construction progress monitoring (ACPM) frameworks have many limitations and challenges that hinder industry-scale deployment and sustained real-world use, reported in the literature. This study aims to critically examine existing frameworks and methods, identifying their limitations and challenges, while proposing future research directions. A mixed-method review approach was employed, comprising a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis, synthesizing data from 117 scholarly articles. This study also assessed the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) and Data Interoperability Maturity (DIM) levels of each selected framework to evaluate its potential capability for real-world application in the construction industry. Quantitatively, our TRL assessment of the representative frameworks shows that approximately 88% fall within TRL 5–7 (controlled-environment validation to arbitrary real-site demonstration), with only 18% reaching TRL 7, none reaching TRL 8–9 (industry-scale deployment), and 12% remaining at TRL ≤ 4.5 (early-stage prototypes); in parallel, about 82% of the reviewed frameworks operate at DIM levels 0–1, indicating that integration remains predominantly manual or file-based. Human–human inter-rater agreement on TRL ratings was near-perfect (quadratic-weighted κ = 0.82), and human–AI agreement was strong (Spearman’s ρ = 0.87; MAE = 0.29 TRL units), supporting the robustness of the reported maturity distribution. Our work reveals that several emerging constraints of those existing frameworks impede the scalable, end-to-end industry-scale deployment. These include highly segmented steps, noisy data, task-specific systems, binary progress reporting, site accessibility issues, and the lack of automated decision-making processes. Addressing these limitations through future research is essential for advancing and enabling end-to-end deployment in real projects. This study contributes a concise investigation to the existing body of knowledge, examining the challenges and assessment of the TRL and DIM levels of current ACPM frameworks that integrate Reality Capture Technology (RCT), BIM, Digital Twin (DT), image processing, and advanced computational tools to automate construction progress monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43065-026-00205-y
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Mixed Review and Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Evaluation of Automated Construction Progress Monitoring (ACPM) Frameworks

Hongtao Dang, Md Jewel Rana
Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience
BIM and Construction Integration
article

A Mixed Review and Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Evaluation of Automated Construction Progress Monitoring (ACPM) Frameworks

Hongtao Dang, Md Jewel Rana
article en

Abstract

The existing automated construction progress monitoring (ACPM) frameworks have many limitations and challenges that hinder industry-scale deployment and sustained real-world use, reported in the literature. This study aims to critically examine existing frameworks and methods, identifying their limitations and challenges, while proposing future research directions. A mixed-method review approach was employed, comprising a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis, synthesizing data from 117 scholarly articles. This study also assessed the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) and Data Interoperability Maturity (DIM) levels of each selected framework to evaluate its potential capability for real-world application in the construction industry. Quantitatively, our TRL assessment of the representative frameworks shows that approximately 88% fall within TRL 5–7 (controlled-environment validation to arbitrary real-site demonstration), with only 18% reaching TRL 7, none reaching TRL 8–9 (industry-scale deployment), and 12% remaining at TRL ≤ 4.5 (early-stage prototypes); in parallel, about 82% of the reviewed frameworks operate at DIM levels 0–1, indicating that integration remains predominantly manual or file-based. Human–human inter-rater agreement on TRL ratings was near-perfect (quadratic-weighted κ = 0.82), and human–AI agreement was strong (Spearman’s ρ = 0.87; MAE = 0.29 TRL units), supporting the robustness of the reported maturity distribution. Our work reveals that several emerging constraints of those existing frameworks impede the scalable, end-to-end industry-scale deployment. These include highly segmented steps, noisy data, task-specific systems, binary progress reporting, site accessibility issues, and the lack of automated decision-making processes. Addressing these limitations through future research is essential for advancing and enabling end-to-end deployment in real projects. This study contributes a concise investigation to the existing body of knowledge, examining the challenges and assessment of the TRL and DIM levels of current ACPM frameworks that integrate Reality Capture Technology (RCT), BIM, Digital Twin (DT), image processing, and advanced computational tools to automate construction progress monitoring.

Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience
Washington State University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
BIM and Construction Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.