Having and eating the cake? The centralisation paradox in decentralised healthcare governance: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Decentralisation in healthcare governance is widely promoted to enhance managerial autonomy, responsiveness, and performance. However, empirical evidence suggests that managers operating in decentralised systems continue to rely on centrally coordinated organisational structures. This interdependence remains insufficiently conceptualised in existing research. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted to synthesise empirical studies examining how central coordination in organisational systems shapes managers' effective decision space in decentralised healthcare organisations. Searches were performed in PubMed and CINAHL, complemented by snowballing. The review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Data were analysed using a conceptual synthesis approach informed by paradox theory and the decision space framework. FINDINGS: Four interrelated themes were identified: (1) delegated authority and experienced autonomy, (2) the role of organisational capacity in enabling decision space, (3) persistent central coordination within decentralised systems, and (4) autonomy dependent on coordination. The findings show that while decentralisation expands formal decision-making authority, the effective exercise of this authority depends on centrally coordinated enabling systems, including digital infrastructure, administrative support, and financial management. This interdependence reflects a consistent pattern across contexts. CONCLUSIONS: The study proposes the concept of a centralisation paradox, demonstrating that managerial autonomy in decentralised healthcare governance is contingent upon central coordination. By extending the decision space model, the study proposes a dual-domain conceptualisation distinguishing between professional decision-making and enabling systems. This reframing advances theoretical understanding of decentralised governance and offers practical insights for designing healthcare organisations that balance local autonomy with system-wide coordination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15162-1
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Having and eating the cake? The centralisation paradox in decentralised healthcare governance: a scoping review

Mikael Ohrling
BMC Health Services Research
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Having and eating the cake? The centralisation paradox in decentralised healthcare governance: a scoping review

Mikael Ohrling
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decentralisation in healthcare governance is widely promoted to enhance managerial autonomy, responsiveness, and performance. However, empirical evidence suggests that managers operating in decentralised systems continue to rely on centrally coordinated organisational structures. This interdependence remains insufficiently conceptualised in existing research. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted to synthesise empirical studies examining how central coordination in organisational systems shapes managers' effective decision space in decentralised healthcare organisations. Searches were performed in PubMed and CINAHL, complemented by snowballing. The review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Data were analysed using a conceptual synthesis approach informed by paradox theory and the decision space framework. FINDINGS: Four interrelated themes were identified: (1) delegated authority and experienced autonomy, (2) the role of organisational capacity in enabling decision space, (3) persistent central coordination within decentralised systems, and (4) autonomy dependent on coordination. The findings show that while decentralisation expands formal decision-making authority, the effective exercise of this authority depends on centrally coordinated enabling systems, including digital infrastructure, administrative support, and financial management. This interdependence reflects a consistent pattern across contexts. CONCLUSIONS: The study proposes the concept of a centralisation paradox, demonstrating that managerial autonomy in decentralised healthcare governance is contingent upon central coordination. By extending the decision space model, the study proposes a dual-domain conceptualisation distinguishing between professional decision-making and enabling systems. This reframing advances theoretical understanding of decentralised governance and offers practical insights for designing healthcare organisations that balance local autonomy with system-wide coordination.

BMC Health Services ResearchVol. 26(1)
Karolinska Institutet (SE), Stockholm Health Care Services (SE)
Karolinska Institutet
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.