The Sinhala hearsay evidential

Abstract Colloquial Sinhala is unusual among Indo-Aryan languages in having an evidential system. By means of the hearsay particle lu , the system opposes reportative to evidentially unmarked utterances. Drawing on attested utterances from corpora and grammaticality/acceptability judgments, we describe the distribution of this particle with particular reference to its overlap with the most commonly occurring complementizer, kiyǝlaa . We show that the characteristics of the Sinhala evidential system generally conform to cross-linguistic trends, but the particle has a relatively wide distribution syntactically. From a discourse perspective, it acts as both a reportative and a quotative marker, marks both direct and indirect speech, and performs specific functions such as marking adages and indicating mention use. Unsurprisingly, it carries distinct semantic-pragmatic overtones of dubiousness, which affect clause interpretation. We set forth this basic description as a foundation for future detailed description and analysis of this evidential particle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2026-0002
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Sinhala hearsay evidential

Theresa M McGarry, Kapugollawe Anandakiththi
Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

The Sinhala hearsay evidential

Theresa M McGarry, Kapugollawe Anandakiththi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Colloquial Sinhala is unusual among Indo-Aryan languages in having an evidential system. By means of the hearsay particle lu , the system opposes reportative to evidentially unmarked utterances. Drawing on attested utterances from corpora and grammaticality/acceptability judgments, we describe the distribution of this particle with particular reference to its overlap with the most commonly occurring complementizer, kiyǝlaa . We show that the characteristics of the Sinhala evidential system generally conform to cross-linguistic trends, but the particle has a relatively wide distribution syntactically. From a discourse perspective, it acts as both a reportative and a quotative marker, marks both direct and indirect speech, and performs specific functions such as marking adages and indicating mention use. Unsurprisingly, it carries distinct semantic-pragmatic overtones of dubiousness, which affect clause interpretation. We set forth this basic description as a foundation for future detailed description and analysis of this evidential particle.

Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics
East Tennessee State University (US), University of Kelaniya (LK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Sinhala hearsay evidential — Theresa M McGarry, Kapugollawe Anandakiththi · Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS