Impacts from mining on cultural values of water: Overcoming policy fragmentation at the domestic and international scale

Resource frontiers are often home to communities whose worldviews are deeply interconnected with the natural environment. Yet, prevailing policy frameworks frequently impose divisions - separating the tangible from the intangible and the natural from the cultural. Although human rights discourses hold significant potential, they too can fail to capture the subtleties of cultural values. As a result, important values across landscapes risk being overlooked or inadequately considered in resource activities. This paper examines examples of regulatory and industry-led (voluntary) approaches to addressing impacts from mining on the cultural values of water. Our research focuses on the language and scope of written instruments. We conclude that while some evidence of integration exists, dominant paradigms may require reconsideration and greater consistency in terminology is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Policy
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2026.106004
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacts from mining on cultural values of water: Overcoming policy fragmentation at the domestic and international scale

Jacqui Robertson, Joshua Matanzima, Evan Hamman, Gavin Chandra
Resources Policy
Mining and Resource Management
article

Impacts from mining on cultural values of water: Overcoming policy fragmentation at the domestic and international scale

Jacqui Robertson, Joshua Matanzima, Evan Hamman, Gavin Chandra
article en

Abstract

Resource frontiers are often home to communities whose worldviews are deeply interconnected with the natural environment. Yet, prevailing policy frameworks frequently impose divisions - separating the tangible from the intangible and the natural from the cultural. Although human rights discourses hold significant potential, they too can fail to capture the subtleties of cultural values. As a result, important values across landscapes risk being overlooked or inadequately considered in resource activities. This paper examines examples of regulatory and industry-led (voluntary) approaches to addressing impacts from mining on the cultural values of water. Our research focuses on the language and scope of written instruments. We conclude that while some evidence of integration exists, dominant paradigms may require reconsideration and greater consistency in terminology is needed.

Resources PolicyVol. 120
Griffith University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Canberra (AU)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Mining and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.