Public Support for Punishing or Treating People Who Use Drugs: The Mediating Roles of Harm and Blame

While individual and contextual characteristics of drug use predict punishment and treatment support, research has not explored whether perceived harm and blame operate as mediators. Using a survey experiment given to a Lucid Theorem sample ( n = 844) of U.S. adults, we test whether perceptions of harm and blame assigned to people who use drugs, their friends, family, community, and society mediate the relationship between drug characteristics and drug policy preferences. Utilizing linear regression models, we find that beliefs of harm and blame predict both punishment and treatment support. However, bootstrapped mediation analysis reveals that only harm to the user is a significant mediator. Our results show that concerns about individual harm, rather than individual blame, partially mediate the relationship between drug type and policy preferences. Policymakers looking to understand public support for drug-related policies should know the public prioritizes reducing harm rather than morally blaming people who use drugs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548261466210
Primary Topic
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Support for Punishing or Treating People Who Use Drugs: The Mediating Roles of Harm and Blame

Jason R. Silver, Benjamin Kuettel
Criminal Justice and Behavior
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
article

Public Support for Punishing or Treating People Who Use Drugs: The Mediating Roles of Harm and Blame

Jason R. Silver, Benjamin Kuettel
article en

Abstract

While individual and contextual characteristics of drug use predict punishment and treatment support, research has not explored whether perceived harm and blame operate as mediators. Using a survey experiment given to a Lucid Theorem sample ( n = 844) of U.S. adults, we test whether perceptions of harm and blame assigned to people who use drugs, their friends, family, community, and society mediate the relationship between drug characteristics and drug policy preferences. Utilizing linear regression models, we find that beliefs of harm and blame predict both punishment and treatment support. However, bootstrapped mediation analysis reveals that only harm to the user is a significant mediator. Our results show that concerns about individual harm, rather than individual blame, partially mediate the relationship between drug type and policy preferences. Policymakers looking to understand public support for drug-related policies should know the public prioritizes reducing harm rather than morally blaming people who use drugs.

Criminal Justice and Behavior
SUNY Oneonta (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.