Beyond earnings quality: evaluating the quality of corporate disclosure practices

Abstract We propose a framework to assess the decision-usefulness of heterogeneous disclosure practices that managers use to convey information to market participants. We illustrate an application of our framework to non-GAAP earnings, management earnings guidance, and earnings conference calls. We first identify key quality attributes for each disclosure practice and then develop a list of quality metrics that we apply to a small pilot sample. We focus on metrics that are easily measured in real time and discuss the practical challenges of conducting assessments of disclosure quality at the firm-quarter-disclosure level. Our descriptive analysis provides preliminary insights into whether and how voluntary disclosure quality varies across firms and highlights the interconnectedness of these disclosure practices. We discuss future research opportunities to expand and fine-tune the application of the framework to develop a comprehensive disclosure quality assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Accounting Studies
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-026-09971-2
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond earnings quality: evaluating the quality of corporate disclosure practices

Sarah E. McVay, Patricia Dechow, Weili Ge, Wei Ting Loh
Review of Accounting Studies
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Beyond earnings quality: evaluating the quality of corporate disclosure practices

Sarah E. McVay, Patricia Dechow, Weili Ge, Wei Ting Loh
article en

Abstract

Abstract We propose a framework to assess the decision-usefulness of heterogeneous disclosure practices that managers use to convey information to market participants. We illustrate an application of our framework to non-GAAP earnings, management earnings guidance, and earnings conference calls. We first identify key quality attributes for each disclosure practice and then develop a list of quality metrics that we apply to a small pilot sample. We focus on metrics that are easily measured in real time and discuss the practical challenges of conducting assessments of disclosure quality at the firm-quarter-disclosure level. Our descriptive analysis provides preliminary insights into whether and how voluntary disclosure quality varies across firms and highlights the interconnectedness of these disclosure practices. We discuss future research opportunities to expand and fine-tune the application of the framework to develop a comprehensive disclosure quality assessment.

Review of Accounting Studies
University of Southern California (US), University of Washington (US), Singapore Management University (SG)
University of Southern California
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond earnings quality: evaluating the quality of corporate disclosure practices — Sarah E. McVay, Patricia Dechow, et al. · Review of Accounting Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS