Psychometric Evaluation of the Positive and Negative Communication Scale with Low-Income Couples Enrolled in Relationship Education: A Two-Study Investigation

Objective This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Communication Scale (PNCS) at the individual and dyadic levels.Methods Two studies were conducted: Study One (N = 1,319) treated individuals as the unit of analysis, and Study Two (N = 726 couples) treated couples as the unit of analysis. We examined factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, concurrent and predictive validity, and measurement invariance.Results In Study One, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported a two-factor model. Subscales demonstrated strong internal consistency, moderate test-retest reliability, and evidence of concurrent and predictive validity. Full invariance was established across English and Spanish forms. In Study Two, dyadic CFA supported the same factor structure across partners, with comparable reliability and validity for men and women. Full invariance was established across dyad members.Conclusion The PNCS demonstrates robust psychometric properties, supporting its use in counseling research and program evaluation with couples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2026.2703616
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric Evaluation of the Positive and Negative Communication Scale with Low-Income Couples Enrolled in Relationship Education: A Two-Study Investigation

Ruiqin Gao, Ryan G. Carlson, Regin Dean, Violet Hodge et al.
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

Psychometric Evaluation of the Positive and Negative Communication Scale with Low-Income Couples Enrolled in Relationship Education: A Two-Study Investigation

Ruiqin Gao, Ryan G. Carlson, Regin Dean, Violet Hodge, Dalena Dillman Taylor, Sejal M. Barden, Silverio Nicole
article en

Abstract

Objective This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Communication Scale (PNCS) at the individual and dyadic levels.Methods Two studies were conducted: Study One (N = 1,319) treated individuals as the unit of analysis, and Study Two (N = 726 couples) treated couples as the unit of analysis. We examined factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, concurrent and predictive validity, and measurement invariance.Results In Study One, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported a two-factor model. Subscales demonstrated strong internal consistency, moderate test-retest reliability, and evidence of concurrent and predictive validity. Full invariance was established across English and Spanish forms. In Study Two, dyadic CFA supported the same factor structure across partners, with comparable reliability and validity for men and women. Full invariance was established across dyad members.Conclusion The PNCS demonstrates robust psychometric properties, supporting its use in counseling research and program evaluation with couples.

Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development
University of Central Florida (US), University of North Texas (US), University of South Carolina (US), University of Alabama (US)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.