Familiarity Breeds Contempt, But Only for Her? Consumer Reactions to CEO Crisis Public Apologies

ABSTRACT Organizational crises place exceptional demands on leaders, yet external evaluations of crisis responses are shaped by both individual and organizational factors. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine how gendered expectations within organizations might shape evaluations of CEO crisis effectiveness in real‑world contexts. An online study was used to examine responses to real‐world CEO crisis apologies. Participants from Australia and the United States ( N = 2347) were randomly assigned to view one of two apology videos delivered by either a female or male CEO following an internal crisis caused by their predecessors. Participants rated crisis leadership effectiveness, trust in the leader, and consumer post‑apology purchase intentions. Individuals who were more familiar with the organization evaluated both CEOs as less trustworthy and less effective, even when they reported strong prior loyalty. This familiarity effect was particularly pronounced for the female CEO. Across conditions, participants with a higher general tendency to trust others provided more positive evaluations overall. Although the male CEO received higher ratings of crisis leadership and trust, organizational familiarity exerted a stronger influence on stakeholder perceptions than CEO gender. As the study relied on real‑world cases, the crises differ in theoretically important ways: Qantas reflects an integrity/ethical crisis with greater reputational risk, whereas Defence Health reflects a competence/technical service disruption. Accordingly, the observed gender pattern should be interpreted as interacting with crisis type, organizational familiarity, and perceived responsibility, rather than as a pure CEO gender effect. These limits constrain causal claims but underscore the value of studying gendered crisis leadership in naturalistic corporate settings. Organizational reputation and gendered expectations can influence responses to CEO apologies. Organizations should account for these factors when planning crisis responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.70203
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Familiarity Breeds Contempt, But Only for Her? Consumer Reactions to CEO Crisis Public Apologies

Rebecca R. Langdon, Michael D. Collins, Justin P. Brienza
Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Familiarity Breeds Contempt, But Only for Her? Consumer Reactions to CEO Crisis Public Apologies

Rebecca R. Langdon, Michael D. Collins, Justin P. Brienza
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Organizational crises place exceptional demands on leaders, yet external evaluations of crisis responses are shaped by both individual and organizational factors. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine how gendered expectations within organizations might shape evaluations of CEO crisis effectiveness in real‑world contexts. An online study was used to examine responses to real‐world CEO crisis apologies. Participants from Australia and the United States ( N = 2347) were randomly assigned to view one of two apology videos delivered by either a female or male CEO following an internal crisis caused by their predecessors. Participants rated crisis leadership effectiveness, trust in the leader, and consumer post‑apology purchase intentions. Individuals who were more familiar with the organization evaluated both CEOs as less trustworthy and less effective, even when they reported strong prior loyalty. This familiarity effect was particularly pronounced for the female CEO. Across conditions, participants with a higher general tendency to trust others provided more positive evaluations overall. Although the male CEO received higher ratings of crisis leadership and trust, organizational familiarity exerted a stronger influence on stakeholder perceptions than CEO gender. As the study relied on real‑world cases, the crises differ in theoretically important ways: Qantas reflects an integrity/ethical crisis with greater reputational risk, whereas Defence Health reflects a competence/technical service disruption. Accordingly, the observed gender pattern should be interpreted as interacting with crisis type, organizational familiarity, and perceived responsibility, rather than as a pure CEO gender effect. These limits constrain causal claims but underscore the value of studying gendered crisis leadership in naturalistic corporate settings. Organizational reputation and gendered expectations can influence responses to CEO apologies. Organizations should account for these factors when planning crisis responses.

Journal of Contingencies and Crisis ManagementVol. 34(3)
Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.